Reference no: EM13551579

5. You are a senior professor who mentored a younger colleague who is coming up for tenure and promotion next year. The colleague had assisted him with some suggestions on a research project, but was not sufficiently involved in the project to warrant co-authorship. In your view, the colleague clearly deserves tenure and promotion, but you know that last year a key committee turned down an equally deserving candidate. With this in mind, you offer to add the colleague's name to yours at the end of two articles about to be submitted for publication. Is this deception permissible? Compare and contrast how utilitarianism, duty ethics, rights ethics, and virtue ethics apply to the case.

6. Discuss what you see as the main similarities and differences between Three Mile Island and Chernobyl.