Reference no: EM13969221
Threaded Discussions: minimum One paragraph of 5 sentences or more per question. Not a paper. Place answer with the corresponding question.
The Traditional Waterfall Method/Model has been much maligned. As the online lesson states, it's a VERY common engineering project management approach, and it's also favored by the old-school project managers (the PMI's PMP is built around it). It's also favored by the accountants/finance folks because it's super easy to track spend, progress, etc.
But, just like the online lesson states, it didn't work well for many kinds of software (SW) development projects.
Question. Is the Traditional Waterfall Method/Model really that bad? Should it never be used? Why?
If there is ever one very contentious part of a SoftWare development project it's the "Requirements". The Requirements are supposed to capture "what" the system is supposed to do, so the engineers can figure out "how" to build it, and then build/test and deploy it.
If you mess up the Requirements, then your project is doomed - even before it gets going. And, even if you get the Requirements perfect (super hard to do), the customer/market can change on you in the middle of your project ... making your Requirements invalid. This is one of the reasons Agile methods are preferred for some types of projects.
A MAJOR problem in getting the Requirements correct is that people tend to be biased - i.e., they seem to believe that customers are like them, so if they like a feature, then customer should like it too - or the customers should be made to like it (think of Windows Vista, ugh).
Question. What are some approaches that companies take (using either the Traditional Waterfall or Agile) to gather the user Requirements so that bias is reduced?
How effective was your training and orientation
: How effective was your training and orientation? How did this person handle performance evaluation and reviews? How did this person coach and mentor his or her staff? What lessons did you learn from this experience?
|
What additional ways can you identify to build trust
: What additional ways can you identify to build trust and credibility as a leader in an organization? Think about professional and personal concerns that you are reluctant to discuss openly.
|
Receiving information about changing a health behavior
: Consider a time when you were receiving information about changing a health behavior. Perhaps you were learning about nutritional or exercise changes that would be important to your health. Maybe you were learning about how to change a behavior that ..
|
Describe what you think are the top three social problems
: Define and describe what you think are the top three social problems in the United States at the present time.
|
The traditional waterfall method
: The Traditional Waterfall Method/Model has been much maligned. As the online lesson states, it's a VERY common engineering project management approach, and it's also favored by the old-school project managers (the PMI's PMP is built around it). It's ..
|
Principles of agribusiness finance
: 1. Which one of the following entities is considered a legal "person"? 3. Which one of the following best describes the liability a general partner has for the partnership debts?
|
What leadership qualities did coaches demonstrate to be able
: Using Coach Boone or Yoast as an example, identify situations where either man demonstrated the four functions of management (planning, organizing, leading, and controlling).
|
Spandella company purchased 175000 shares of filington
: On January 4, 2016, Spandella Company purchased 175,000 shares of Filington Company directly from one of the founders for a price of $30 per share. Filington has 500,000 shares outstanding, including the shares acquired by Spandella Company. On July ..
|
What is constructive conflict and relationship conflict
: What is constructive conflict and relationship conflict and their differences? How do you apply constructive conflict into relationship conflict?
|