The decision was for whom and why

Assignment Help Management Theories

Reference no: EM131379145

Food Caterers, Inc., had a franchise agreement with Chicken Delight, Inc. Carfiro was employed by Food Caterers to deliver hot chicken bearing the trademark "Chicken Delight." While making a delivery, Carfiro was involved in an accident that killed McLaughlin.

In a suit naming Chicken Delight, the franchiser, as defendant, the McLaughlin estate argued that Carfiro was an agent of Chicken Delight, because Carfiro was acting for the benefit of the company. There was no evidence, however, that Carfiro was hired, paid, instructed by, or even known by Chicken Delight. The decision was for whom, and why?

Estate of McLaughlin v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 321 A.2d 456 (CT).

Reference no: EM131379145

Questions Cloud

Make a scatterplot and describe the association : Why would you not want to talk about the correlation between a planet's Position and Distance from the sun?

How would the court rule : Savant could not be located, so Pierce brought suit against Chapman and Super. Chapman argued that the newspaper notice was sufficient to warn Pierce not to deal with Savant. How would the court rule? Explain.

Were turners actions outside the scope of his employment : The state concluded, the court should dismiss Elliot's claim against it. Were Turner's actions outside the scope of his employment as a prison guard? Explain.

Find the correlation of flights with year : Note two reasons that the correlation you found in part a is not a suitable summary of the strength of the association. Can you account for these violations of the conditions?

The decision was for whom and why : There was no evidence, however, that Carfiro was hired, paid, instructed by, or even known by Chicken Delight. The decision was for whom, and why?

Describe the value proposition : Describe the value proposition behind General Electrics Industrial Internet initiative (e.g. what job does GE’s strategic initiative aim to fulfill for its consumers?).

Excess capacity is problem in monopolistic competition : Excess capacity is a problem in monopolistic competition because if there were fewer firms in the industry: The model of monopolistic competition characterizes a city's market for plumbing services. Suppose that the market is initially in long-run eq..

Was the borough of keansburg liable to mcandrew : Mularchuk proceeded to make arrests and, in the course of events, shot and seriously injured McAndrew . Was the borough of Keansburg liable to McAndrew under the doctrine of respondeat superior? Explain.

Is young correct on either of these points : She also argued that even though the power to hire employees was not in the union constitution, the power to do so was implied by the powers of the president to preside over the union's administrative matters. Is Young correct on either of these p..

User Account

All Pages