The constitutional convention-agreements and compromises

Assignment Help Other Subject
Reference no: EM133234441

Summarize this:

The Constitutional Convention: Agreements and Compromises

In May 1787, the Constitutional Convention began the difficult task of crafting a new system of government. The state legislatures sent 55 delegates to Philadelphia. Many of these men had a great deal of experience working in politics and government. George Washington and Benjamin Franklin both took active roles in the debates at the convention. Two other Pennsylvanians made important contributions, too. Gouverneur Morris wrote the final draft of the Constitution, and James Wilson did important work on the details of the document. James Madison of Virginia was the author of the basic plan of government that the convention eventually adopted. His careful notes are our major source of information about the convention's work.

The convention began by unanimously choosing George Washington to preside over the meetings. 

It was decided that each state would have one vote on all questions, and a simple majority of the states present would make decisions. The public and press were not permitted to attend the meetings. The delegates hoped that the private setting would allow them to talk freely.

Summarize this:

Key Agreements

After deciding to abandon the Articles of Confederation, the delegates reached a consensus on many basic issues of forming a new government. They all favored the ideas of limited and representative government. They agreed that the powers of the national government should be divided among legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The delegates all believed it was necessary to limit the states' power to coin money and interfere with creditors' rights. And all of them agreed that they should strengthen the national government.

The great debates and compromises of the convention were not over these fundamental questions; rather, they dealt with how to put these ideas into practice.

Summarize this:

The Virginia Plan

The debates opened with a proposal from the Virginia delegation, which outlined a plan for a strong national government. The plan proposed a government based on three principles. First, the government would have a strong national legislature with two chambers. The lower chamber would be chosen by the people and the upper chamber would be chosen by the lower. The number of legislators would vary from state to state and would be determined by how many people lived in the state. The legislature would also have the power to bar any state laws it believed to be unconstitutional. Second, a strong executive would be chosen by the national legislature. Third, a national judiciary would be appointed by the legislature.

The delegates debated the Virginia Plan for more than two weeks. Delegates from the smaller states quickly realized that the larger, more populous states would be in control of a strong national government under this plan. The smaller states wanted a less powerful central government and more independence for the states.

Summarize this:

The New Jersey Plan

The delegates for the small states made a counterproposal. The New Jersey Plan called for keeping two major features of the Articles of Confederation. First, the government would have a unicameral legislature with one vote for each state. This made all states equally powerful, regardless of their population. Second, the nation would continue to function as a confederation of sovereign states.

Congress, however, would be strengthened by having the power to impose taxes and regulate trade.

A weak executive, consisting of more than one person, would be elected by Congress. A national judiciary with limited power would be appointed by the executive.

As the summer wore on, the convention became deadlocked over the question of the representation of states in Congress. The debate was bitter, and the convention was in danger of dissolving.

Summarize this:

The Connecticut Compromise

Finally, a special committee agreed on a compromise. Called the Connecticut Compromise, or the Great Compromise, this plan was adopted after a long debate. The compromise suggested that the legislative branch should be bicameral, or have two houses. One would be a House of Representatives, with the number of representatives based on each state's population. The other would be a Senate, with two members from each state. The larger states would have an advantage in the House of Representatives, where representation would be based on population. Congress would be able to impose taxes, and all laws concerning taxing and spending would originate in the House. The smaller states would be protected in the Senate, with equal representation and state legislatures electing the senators.

Summarize this:

Compromises About the Presidency

There was further disagreement over whether the president should be elected directly by the people, by the Congress, or by state legislatures. As a compromise, the delegates finally settled on the Electoral College system, which is still used today. In this system, voters from each state select electors to choose the president. The president's four-year term was a compromise between those who wanted a longer term and those who feared a long term would give a president too much power.

Summarize this:

Disputes over Slavery

James Madison's notes tell us that the delegates disagreed about how to handle slavery. At the time of the convention, several Northern states were making plans to abolish slavery. Many delegates were opposed to slavery and some wanted it abolished. However, it was clear that the Southern states would never accept the Constitution if it interfered with slavery. In the end, the delegates did not deal with the issue. The Constitution mentions the slave trade and escaped enslaved persons but does not address legal or moral issues related to the ownership of enslaved persons. In fact, the Constitution does not include the word slave anywhere. Instead of saying "slave" or "slavery," the Constitution refers to the "importation" of people, and "persons held to service or labor."

The delegates realized that their compromises on slavery had not completely solved the issue. They had compromised in order to create the new government. But their refusal to deal with slavery entirely left the matter to later generations of Americans to resolve.

Summarize this:

The Three-Fifths Compromise

There was great disagreement about how to count enslaved persons in matters of representation and taxation. Almost one-third of the people living in the Southern states were enslaved African Americans. Delegates from these states wanted enslaved persons to be counted the same as free people to give the South more representation in Congress. At the same time, the Southern states did not want enslaved persons counted at all when it came to paying taxes. Because few enslaved persons lived in the North, Northern states took the opposite position. They wanted enslaved persons counted for tax purposes but not for representation.

The Three-Fifths Compromise settled this deadlock. Instead of counting every enslaved person, only three- fifths of the group were to be counted for both tax purposes and for representation. Enslaved persons were counted in this way until 1868. By that date, the three-fifths rule had been eliminated by two events. One was the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment abolishing slavery. The other was the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment, making it a rule to count a state's entire population when figuring out representation in Congress.

Summarize this:

Commerce and the Slave Trade

A third compromise resolved a dispute over commerce and the slave trade-not slavery itself, but the continuing transport and sale of enslaved persons. The Northern states wanted the federal government to have complete control over trade with other nations. The Southern states were afraid that the federal government would interfere with the slave trade. States in the South depended heavily on agricultural exports such as cotton and tobacco. Southern farmers could not produce large crops and make huge profits without using slave labor. Southern states also feared that business interests in the North would have enough votes in Congress to impose export taxes or pass trade agreements that would hurt the South.

As a compromise, the delegates decided that Congress would have the power to regulate both interstate commerce and commerce with foreign countries. However, Congress could not ban the slave trade before 1808. To protect the South's exports, Congress was also prevented from imposing export taxes. As a result, the United States is one of the few nations in the world today that does not directly tax the goods it exports.

Summarize this:

Ratifying the Constitution

By September 17, 1787, the Constitution was complete. Thirty-nine delegates signed the document, including the aging Ben Franklin, who had to be helped to the table to sign it. Before the new Constitution could become law, however, it had to be ratified by nine of the thirteen states.

The Constitution went into effect in June 1788, when New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify it. However, the political debate over ratification lasted until May 29, 1790, when Rhode Island became the last state to ratify.

Summarize this:

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists

The question of ratification quickly divided the people in the states. One group, known as the Federalists, favored the new Constitution. Many of the Founders were Federalists. Much of their support came from merchants and others in the cities and coastal regions. The other group, called the Anti-Federalists, opposed the new Constitution. Much of their support came from the inland farmers and laborers, who feared a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists criticized the Constitution for having been drafted in secret. They claimed the document was extralegal, not sanctioned by law, because the convention had the authority only to revise the old Articles of Confederation, not to form a new government. The Anti-Federalists further argued that the Constitution took important powers away from the states.

The Anti-Federalists' strongest argument was that the Constitution lacked a bill of rights to protect citizens from their own government. The convention had, in fact, thought of adding a list of people's rights. In their talks, they reasoned that it was not necessary to have a bill of rights because the Constitution did not give the government the power to violate the rights of the people.

This reasoning was not good enough for the Anti-Federalists. They warned that without a bill of rights, a strong national government might take away the rights that were won in the Revolution. They demanded that the new Constitution clearly guarantee citizens' freedoms. One of the strongest opponents of the Constitution was Patrick Henry, the passionate delegate from Virginia. He insisted that rights not clearly given to the people could be taken away from them by rulers.

The Federalists claimed that only a strong national government could protect the nation from foreign enemies and solve the country's problems. The Federalists also pointed out that eight of the states already had a bill of rights in their state constitution. In the end, the Federalists promised to add a bill of rights as the first order of business when the new government met.

Summarize this:

Progress Toward Ratification

With the promise of a bill of rights, more American citizens were in favor of the Constitution. Many small states ratified it quickly because they were pleased with equal representation in the new Senate. By 1788, the legislatures in Virginia and New York had not yet held a vote on the new Constitution. Everyone knew that without the support of those two large and powerful states, the Constitution would not succeed. The Federalists won in a close vote in Virginia on June 25, 1788.

To help win the battle in New York, vocal supporters published more than 80 essays defending the new Constitution. Alexander Hamilton and James Madison wrote most of the essays, called The Federalist Papers. Madison brilliantly answered the opposition's fears about having a big government. In The Federalist No. 10, he said that the more the government is extended to include everyone, the less likely it is that a majority will attack the rights of other citizens. On July 26, 1788, the Federalists in New York won by three votes. In The Federalist No. 39, Madison defines a republic as "a government which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people, and is administered by persons holding their offices . . . for a limited period."

Summarize this:

The New Government Begins Its Work

Once the new government was established, George Washington was elected president and John Adams vice president. Voters also elected senators and representatives. On March 4, 1789, Congress met for the first time in Federal Hall in New York City, the temporary capital. To fulfill the promises made during the fight for ratification, James Madison introduced a set of amendments during the first session. Congress approved 12 amendments. The states ratified 10 of them in 1791. These amendments became known as the Bill of Rights.

Reference no: EM133234441

Questions Cloud

Community college or criminal justice reform : Assume you are a citizen organizer for an interest group trying to mobilize voters before the mid-term elections in November. You get to decide the characterist
Explain freedom of speech : Find one case, decided by the Supreme Court, as it pertains to the freedom of speech as described in the First Amendment. Provide a description of this case inc
Legislature and parties use of gerrymandering : How do historical, social, political, economic, and cultural forces in Texas lead to the legislature's and parties use of gerrymandering? Consider Texas politic
Describe the two non-governmental organizations : Identify a u.s. social problem. Describe the two non-governmental organizations (not a government agency, a law, or political candidate) that work on this issue
The constitutional convention-agreements and compromises : In May 1787, the Constitutional Convention began the difficult task of crafting a new system of government. The state legislatures sent 55 delegates to Philadel
Discuss the distinctions between and corona impeachment : Discuss extensively the distinctions between and among the Corona Impeachment, Serena Quo Warranto, and the Leonen attempted removal.
Petitioned for redress in the most humble terms : "In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury.
Identify the types of incident management teams : Identify the types of Incident Management Teams (IMT). List an example of a specific type of incident to which each might deploy and the typical size of a team
Who were the key players within each system : After reading the chapters in Tignor, please answer the following questions:

Reviews

Write a Review

Other Subject Questions & Answers

  What role does nurse practitioner play in care of sexually

Sexual assault, What role does a nurse practitioner play in the care of sexually assaulted patients, particularly in the adolescent age group?

  How each of those is incorporated

As you considered the four central concepts of professional nursing from the lesson, you thought how each of those is incorporated into your own philosophy of nursing.

  Analysis to both piece of architecture and work of art

we will give a detailed analysis to both a piece of architecture and a work of art. However, we will examine art in your community and life. The objective of the assignment is to apply the concepts from the chapter to art and architecture in daily li..

  History of brazil and the united states

Describe the differences and similarities between the history of Brazil and the United States. Include the slave trade, the legacy of slavery and the treatment of the countries' indigenous people.

  Analysis leading to prioritisation of health needs

Understand the principles of needs assessment, different types of community needs and analysis leading to prioritisation of health needs

  Explore the four phases of the information research process

For each of the four phases of the information research process, identify the corresponding steps and develop a set of questions that a researcher should attempt to answer.

  Two is that support the entire organization

Two IS that support the entire organization are:

  Develop a position paper - sigmund freud

In 2,000-2,500-words develop a position paper in which you: Relate your chosen topic (Sigmund Freud) to personality development. You must have a well-developed thesis and strong argumentation to support your thesis

  Maintain high expectations for all learners

It is very important as educators to really know their students, how they learn, and what interests them. Educators must remember to always maintain high expectations for all learners no matter the disability.

  Compare the two sides of the gun control debate

Compare and contrast the two sides of the gun control debate. Discuss the Chambliss study on the saints and the roughnecks and explain the social impact of labeling

  Describe the four stages of decontamination

In a minimum of 250 - 300 words, describe the four stages of decontamination and their importance in the decontamination process.

  Name the four pressures that control water exchange

Identify the two substances that are most important in regulating the amount of water reabsorbed by the kidneys tubules. Name four pressures that control water.

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd