The case study of the transferred employee

Assignment Help Operation Management

Reference no: EM132223158

The Case Study of the Transferred Employee

You are an administrator of a department in a health organization that has recently been reorganized. Personnel from other units have been permanently transferred into your department so that your department can take on additional tasks in support of the mission of the health organization. After two months, one of your new employees comes to you asking for you to complete his annual job performance appraisal. You are surprised because all the annual performance appraisals were supposed to be completed by the supervisors of the departments that were closed before they were transferred into your department. Because you do not believe you know the new employee well enough to do an annual performance appraisal, you call the former supervisor and ask that she complete the performance evaluation herself on the employee. The former supervisor refuses, and says that it is now your problem. The former supervisor further states that no one from Human Resources told her that she was suppose to do a performance appraisal on the employee before the employee left her division. The supervisor also confides in you that writing a performance appraisal 90 days after it is due will trigger a “Red Flag” with Human Resources that may reflect negatively on the supervisor’s management and supervisory effectiveness of her department.

Frustrated with the situation, you approach your supervisor and ask for his guidance. He suggests that you change the date on the employee’s internal transfer documents making the employee appear like he arrived in your department yesterday. Your supervisor also said he would talk to the other department leader and make sure she did an evaluation for 12 months on the employee and not just for 9 months. It was also suggested that you could provide some input on the evaluation because the employee did work for you for the last 60 days. Your supervisor says, “This happens all the time.” It is easily corrected by creating a new set of documents.” He assures you that there is nothing illegal about this, and that this methodology is used frequently to correct otherwise careless administrative actions in the facility. Your supervisor then tells you to go back to your office, retrieve the transfer documents already in place, and replace them with new ones representing the dates you and he just talked about.

As you begin to walk back to your office, you begin to feel uncomfortable taking an administratively correct set of documents, destroying them and then replacing them with some newly created documents that do not represent the actual dates of the transfer. You believe this only further provides support for an otherwise ineffective Human Resource System. However, as a new department head, you are uncomfortable losing favor with the boss who controls your future in the organization. To protect yourself, you informally call the organization’s legal council to get some advice. Legal counsel tells you that your supervisor is indeed correct; it is not illegal to change the documents if changing the documents results in a correction to a previously incorrect administrative error. You counter by telling legal council that this may not have been a human resource or administrative error as much as it is the avoidance of a negative human resource action. Legal counsel suggests you go back and discuss this with your supervisor if you are uncomfortable doing anything regarding this matter. This suggestion makes you more uncomfortable because your boss is not an individual who enjoys repeating himself or being challenged or questioned by his employees. Your boss perceives such events as the actions of disloyal employees. You are certain that going back to your supervisor will result in an uncomfortable event for you.

What do you do?

Do you change the documents?

Do you go back and confront your supervisor

What is your decision and why did you make it?

What is your next course of action?

What factors do you consider in your decisions?

What distributive justice theory best supports your decisions regarding this case and why?

Reference no: EM132223158

Questions Cloud

Generalized structure and layout of latin american cities : Describe the generalized structure and layout of Latin American cities.

What are the negative effects of predetermined roles : What are the positive aspects to the various defined roles in a culture? What are the negative effects of predetermined roles?

Nature might provide useful insights into leadership : Weak things are more likely to survive beause they can adapt. What other metaphors or images from nature might provide useful insights into leadership?

Achieving good balance between work-life responsibilities : What are some of the flexibilities your organization allows to assist employees with achieving a good balance between work and life responsibilities?

The case study of the transferred employee : You are an administrator of a department in a health organization that has recently been reorganized. Do you go back and confront your supervisor

What is regonline and expressplanner : What is RegOnline and Expressplanner? What is the list of the functions of their website? Would you choose this company? Why?

Documentation in the form of lessons learned : Documentation in the form of lessons learned and end-of-project reports can be extremely valuable for future projects and teams within a company.

Theory of charismatic leadership : House suggested that charismatic leaders act in unique ways that have specific charismatic effects on their followers.” Northouse continues.

Plan–do–check–act is iterative four-step management : Plan–Do–Check–Act (PDCA) is an iterative four-step management method used in business for the control and continual improvement of processes and products.

User Account

All Pages