Reference no: EM133034053 , Length: 1500 Words
MGT600 Management, People and Teams
Assessment - Team Performance Evaluation
Learning Outcome 1: Critically assess the key principles and theories underlying management to achieve high-performing organisations at projects, teams, and individual levels.
Learning Outcome 2: Critically evaluate and reflect on effective relationships between people and teams in organisations and projects.
Learning Outcome 3: Demonstrate effective communication and practical problem- solving skills to manage people in a range of complex contexts.
Learning Outcome 4: Critically reflect on the roles and functions that managers perform in the context of the challenges and risks in the changing global environment.
Learning Outcome 5: Develop and justify contemporary management strategies to address a variety of people management issues to ensure best practice and quality outcomes
Assessment Task
You are required to critically assess the performance of your team and recommend improvements based on the relevant concepts and frameworks you have learnt in this subject in a 1,500-word team evaluation report.
Please refer to the Instructions for details on how to complete this task.
Context
Managers are responsible for the delivery of products/services and results whether that be in an operational or project context. This invariably requires not only the creation and development of teams including performance improvement but also the management of a variety of team, organisational, and cultural dynamics. This assessment requires you to conduct a review of team performance and demonstrate and apply your understanding of team processes and dynamics. In doing so, you will review
the performance of the group to which you were allocated for the purpose of Assessments 1 and 2. This will help you to demonstrate analytical, evaluative, and problem-solving skills to develop strategies and actions for performance improvement.
Instructions
1. Review your team's performance in completing the first two assessments and make recommendations for improvement.
• In reviewing the team performance, considerations must be given to the following:
o How did your team come together and what phases or stages did it go through?
o What roles did team members play?
o What challenges were presented?
o How did individual, team, and contextual dynamics impact performance?
o What would you do differently to improve performance?
o How would you apply your learnings in your current or future workplace?
• Please note that you are not required to review the quality and content of the assessments you produced as a team. Instead, you are required to review the performance of the team in completing the assessment tasks.
• You are required to specifically apply and discuss concepts from Modules 4, 5, and 6 as well as any relevant processes and concepts from earlier modules.
• The evaluation needs to be supported with evidence from academic research as well as examples from your own experiences and or observations. You will also find the module activities useful in prompting your thinking.
2. Write a team evaluation report of 1500 words using the following structure:
Cover sheet: Student details (student name, ID number, subject code & name, assessment number and title)
Executive summary Table of contents
Introduction: Outline the purpose and structure of your report.
Background: Briefly describe your team's purpose and relevant contextual issues.
Main discussion: Review your team's performance covering key concepts from all modules. Exploring these within an appropriate theoretical framework would be appropriate here.
Recommendations / action plan: Provide recommended strategies and actions to improve your
team's performance. Conclusion Reference list Appendices
3. You are strongly advised to read the rubric, which is an evaluation guide with criteria for grading your assignment-this will give you a clear picture of what a successful report looks like.
Referencing
It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research.
Attachment:- Team Performance Evaluation.rar
Efficient supply chain design for highly perishable foods
: Designing supply routes is a challenge for any large retailer, particularly under conditions of rapid growth. When faced with significant uncertainty, many unte
|
Explain the basis of contract law
: Problem: Case Study In 1997, a Canada Trust branch made a reservation at the Steak and Caesar Restaurant in Ottawa for 30 people for the Saturday before Christm
|
Calculate the defined benefit obligation
: For December 31, 2016, calculate the defined benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets and the net defined benefit pension asset or liability
|
Compute the value of millennium chemist bond
: Millennium Chemist Ltd. issued a bond that has 14% coupon rate, paid semi-annually. The bond has a face value of $1,000 and will mature 10 years from now.
|
Team Performance Evaluation Assessment
: Team Performance Evaluation Assessment - critically assess the performance of your team and recommend improvements based on the relevant concepts and frameworks
|
What is planet return on investment
: Planet Company had operating income of $12,000, average operating assets of $125,000, and sales of $45,000. What is Planet's return on investment (ROI)
|
What type of withdrawal plan would be appropriate
: Question - An investor currently has $120,000 remaining under a withdrawal plan. What type of withdrawal plan would be appropriate
|
Provide an answer key for the given transactions
: Please provide an answer key for the following transactions - July 31 Paid the electricity bill for July 4,500, telephone for 1,600 and advertising for 800
|
Develop a six-month merchandise budget for anne
: Anne Cummins is in the process of developing the merchandise budget for a beachwear shop she is opening in Maui, Hawaii, next year.
|