Assignment submitted with 3 or more presentation errors. Meaning unclear. Contains many grammar and/or spelling errors. Assignment deviates largely from presentation parameters. Meaning unclear. Contains frequent grammar and/or spelling errors. Assignment deviates significantly from prescribed presentation parameters. Referencing 7 6 5 4 3 2 - 1 Referencing (QUT APA) conforms with QUT CiteWrite guidelines 10% Accurately and consistently adhered to QUT APA referencing conventions, in both the text and the reference list Almost always accurately and consistently adhered to QUT APA referencing conventions, in both the text and the reference list Accurately followed, for the most part, QUT APA referencing conventions in both the text and the reference list Followed some of QUT APA referencing conventions in both the text and the reference list with a few minor errors Referencing is inaccurate with multiple errors andor is unsystematic. Referencing is unsystematic and/or largely absent.

Literary presentation and writing style 7 6 5 4 3 2 - 1 Clarity of expression (including accuracy, spelling, grammar, punctuation). Conforming to assignment instructions and conventions (including word length). 10% Fluent writing style appropriate to the assignment. Grammar and spelling accurate. Assignment within prescribed presentation parameters. Language fluent. Minor grammar and spelling errors only. Assignment submitted with 1 presentation error. Language mainly fluent. Grammar and spelling mostly accurate. Assignment submitted with 2 presentation errors. Meaning apparent but language not always fluent. Contains grammar and/or spelling errors.

Critical thinking and use of evidence 7 6 5 4 3 2 - 1 Overall evidence of reading 10% Has critically appraised the literature and provided rationale based on a wide range of quality literature. Has developed and provided rationale using a range of quality sources. Clear evidence and application of a variety of contemporary and quality sources relevant to the topic. Some rationale Literature is presented with some evidence of application but tends towards description. Limited rationale Literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive way and indicates limitation of understanding. Literature presented is not integrated and/or is irrelevant to the topic. Evidence of literature 10% All references from appropriate peer reviewed journals

Knowledge and understanding Criteria 7 6 5 4 3 2 - 1 Uses the process of reflection to demonstrate professional learning 30% Exceptionally clear and focused. Relevant, engaging. Several issues identified with supporting rationale Clear and focused. Interesting ideas. Several issues identified with supporting rationale Evident of a main idea with supporting rationale Evidence main idea with some supporting rationale. May be limited Evidence of some knowledge Response is limited in detail. Purpose and main idea is unclear. Irrelevant details Content Reflection on culture, social context and implications for practice Demonstrates comprehensive and detailed knowledge of issues identified Demonstrates comprehensive knowledge of issues identified Demonstrates sound knowledge of issues identified Demonstrates factual knowledge of issues identified Evidence of some knowledge of issues. Response is limited in detail. Lacks evidence of knowledge relevant to the issues and/or significantly misuses information. 30%

Add additional requirement specific to assignment type: • Headings must be used to structure your assignment logically. • An introduction and a conclusion are not required. • This is a reflection, so use ‘I’…….. • Do not use dot points • The use of a minimum of 10 references – one book (the prescribed textbook ONLY), and 9 peer reviewed journal articles. Learning outcomes assessed: • Demonstrate and apply knowledge regarding a person’s autonomy and legal capacity (Core Value 3) • Demonstrate and apply knowledge regarding the safety of a person’s dignity, their culture, values, beliefs, and their rights (Core Value 4) • Demonstrates principles of continuing professional development for self and others (Core Value 2)

Estimated time to complete task: 20 hours Weighting: 30% How will I be assessed: 7-point grading scale using a rubric This assessment task must: Your assignment should be written in CiteWrite APA style and prepared as follows: • Has a cover sheet with the assessment title, your name, student number, tutor name and word count. Coversheet template is recommended. • Include a ‘footer’ on each page with your name, student number, unit code and page number. • 3 cm margins on all sides, double-spaced text • Use font, such as Times New Roman, Arial or Calibri; font size 12 • CiteWrite APA style referencing

please follow the Assessment pdf. APA Academic writing , Minimun 10 references : 1 reference should be text book only, 9 references should be peer reviewed journal articles should be less than 7 year old. need weblink And I will attach the readings and pdf tp complete the assignment task