Symbolic logic-predicate logic

Assignment Help Mathematics

Reference no: EM13132598

The sentence below is a theorem of predicate logic. Show that it is by deriving it from the null set of premises. If any "individual" in the domain has a property, then every individual has it. I need help explaining this and with the derivation.

(EX)(FX --->(Y)FY)

Reference no: EM13132598

Questions Cloud

Probability that mean of a sample families in pounds : Assume the standard deviation of the distribution is 2.5 pounds. Find the probability that the mean of a sample of 55 families will be between 17 and 18 pounds.

Compuitng symbolic logic-predicate logic : The asterisk implies a conditional usually indicated by an arrow. The & sign indicates "and". In Aristotelian logic (X)(FX*GX) logically implies (EX)(FX & GX). Is this true in predicate logic? If not, why not?

How many moles of n atoms : how many moles of N atoms are there in .882 moles of (NH2)2CO?

What is the enthalpy of solution : A 4.50-g sample of LiCl at 25.0C dissovles in 25.0mL of water also at 25.0C. Th final equilibrium temerpature of the resulting solution is 60.8C

Symbolic logic-predicate logic : The sentence below is a theorem of predicate logic. Show that it is by deriving it from the null set of premises. If any "individual" in the domain has a property, then every individual has it. I need help explaining this and with the derivation.

The story to show what you''re seeing : Our reading from Muller and Williams talks about a number of different elements of writing, including character, setting, point of view, tone, symbolism, style, and theme

How much inventory can baker purchase : How much inventory can Baker purchase without violating its debt agreement if their total current assets equal $15 million.

Compare and contrast the differences between men and women : ESSAY : COMPARE AND CONTRAST THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN. USE POINT BY POINT METHOD (500 WORDS)

Symbolic logic problem-sentence to expression : Transcribe the English argument below into an appropriate logical language adequate to determine it to be valid. Also, please provide a derivation of the conclusion from the premises within the same logical system (by which you transcribed it).

User Account

All Pages