Summary of your impressions and observed

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM133684032

Part 1 should be a summary of what you observed, including then following:

A. Details of Court Hearing

Name of the Parties : the crown represented by Ms. De Smet vs. Ms. Broha with the lawyer Mr. Thompson

Place of Trial or Hearing

Date of Trial or Hearing

Courtroom number and name of the Judge: Courtroom 103, Honorable Judge Mr. Lee

Level of court (i.e. Provincial Court or Supreme Court)

Trial by Jury or Judge

Ms. De Smet, representing the Crown, delivering the prosecution's opening statement, outlining the charges against Ms. Broha. (stolen car, fraud, possessing ID for another people etcc

B. Summary of What You Heard in Court

Who was talking while you were there, and what were they saying? Depending on what point the trial is at what you may see and here could be any of the following:

Witnesses being questioned by a lawyer

Lawyers making arguments in front of the judge

A judge asking for clarification from a witness

A judge's decision- although many/most of you will not hear this. ( Judge Lee delivered the verdict. Ms. Broha was sentenced to 15 months in prison. Additionally, as part of the sentencing, the judge ordered electronic monitoring with an ankle bracelet, no direct or indirect contact with civilian individuals, and not possessing equipment for making footage ID.)

Part 2 should be a summary of your impressions, including:

Your views on the court proceedings you have seen (Did anything surprise you? Or was it what you were expecting? How did you feel? E.g. nervous, bored? Why?)

Your views on parts of the process you thought were effective and or not effective (Did you identify any ways the process be improved?)

What did you think of each sides lawyers? Did one side (e.g. prosecution/defence, or plaintiff/defendant impress you more? If so, explain why.

Were all of the parties (including the accused if a criminal case) in attendance? Was anyone else watching the case?

A discussion of the appropriateness of the proceedings, the role of the judge, the jury (if applicable), the lawyers and the litigants.

Reference no: EM133684032

Questions Cloud

Explain the concept of probable cause : What is the difference between a frisk and a search of a person? Explain the concept of Probable Cause.

Same protections as general workers : Do skilled workers or professionals need the same protections as general workers? What about so-called "gig" workers?

Explain the term burden of proof : Explain the term burden of proof. Who has the burden of proof in a criminal case? What is the burden of persuasion?

Basis for discharge or denying promotion : May the government use the speech of a public employee as the basis for discharge or denying promotion?

Summary of your impressions and observed : summary of your impressions, Your views on parts of the process you thought were effective and or not effective

About state child care regulations : When you accepted your job of caring for infants, you were not informed about state child care regulations.

Explain evidence collection processes for solid : Explain the evidence collection processes for a solid, liquid, and gas evidence collection.

Explain the evolution of the term free passage : Explain the evolution of the term free passage and how the case changed it. How do maritime jurisdictional concepts relate to free passage?

Mediation is popular choice for resolving disputes : Mediation is a popular choice for resolving disputes. In fact, many courts are now requiring parties to meet with a court-appointed mediator before a judge

User Account

All Pages