Presentation and Quality of Writing Quality of writing at a very high standard. Sections are coherently connected to each other. Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. Quality of writing is of a high standard. Sections are mostly well structured. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. Quality of writing is of a good standard. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. Some problems with sentence structure and presentation. Frequent grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes. Use of inappropriate language. Quality of writing is at a very poor standard so barely understandable. Many spelling mistakes. Little or no evidence of proof reading.

Closing Excellent articulation of task; tied the arguments/insights together highlighting the use in future career and life generally. Good articulation of task; clearly tied the arguments/insights together highlighting the use in future career and life generally. Fair articulation of task; mostly tied the arguments/insights together highlighting the use in future career and life generally. Poor articulation of task; attempted to tie the arguments/insights together highlighting the use in future career and life generally. Poor articulation of task; did not tie the arguments/insights together highlighting the use in future career and life generally.

Explained how the self-reflect tool has enhanced your knowledge of yourself Superior appreciation self- knowledge based upon the Reflect Tool. Very convincing appreciation of self-knowledge based upon the Reflect Tool. Fair appreciation of self- knowledge based upon the Reflect Tool. Poor appreciation of self- knowledge based upon the Reflect Tool. No appreciation of self- knowledge based upon the Reflect Tool. Discussed how knowledge is developed and/or challenged. Superior discussion of how knowledge is developed and/or changed. Very convincing discussion of how knowledge is developed and/or changed. Fair discussion of how knowledge is developed and/or changed. Poor discussion of how knowledge is developed and/or changed. No discussion of how knowledge is developed and/or changed.

Key Criteria Exceeds Expectations Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 75 - 84% Meets Expectations Meets Expectations Below Expectations (High Distinction) 85- 100% (Credit) 65 – 74% (Pass) 50 – 64% (Fail) below 50% Identified and explained the importance or significance of 2 learning outcomes from each individual lecture/tutorial. Regular updates and insightful reflection. Student insights are interesting, thoughtful and demonstrates an ability to put ideas into an appropriate conceptual frame. Regular updates and insightful reflection. Student insights are interesting and thoughtful. Regular updates and insightful reflection. Regular updates and satisfactory reflection. Irregular updates and unsatisfactory reflection.

i have attached assessment criteria and description in this message which is like idea of format and marking criteria of my assignment, in the message i am sending all the lecture and workshop slides which are the base of this assignment.And i hope i will get a better work response as it costs 40% of my total subject marks so make sure it should be worthy and i need this before deadline.