Summarize the speech given by chrystia

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM133348153

Case: Summarize the speech given by Chrystia Freeland at the Brookings Institute in early October 2002.

Your summary should aim to be approximately one page. Use direct quotations and footnotes to capture the critical passages from the speech.

Freeland is going to both articulate her view of the current nature of international relations, and will then offer a policy response the Government of Canada will take as it pivots and adjusts to the "new" realities of World Politics. Your summary should speak to both of these features of Freeland's speech.

Reference no: EM133348153

Questions Cloud

What does this say about legitimacy : Should the state be able to pursue interests that are separate from those of society if the state believes it's best for the people? Based on your answer

Several different methodologies : (Note: A reasonable case could be made for several different methodologies - and reasonable arguments could be made against each.

How should the court determine its rulings on realities : How should the Court determine its rulings on realities that are in dispute? Choose a case we have discussed that relies on a social fact ruling and explain

When did psychology become science : When did psychology become a science? Or has it yet? Your answer should make reference to some specific event or development

Summarize the speech given by chrystia : Summarize the speech given by Chrystia Freeland at the Brookings Institute in early October 2002 - current nature of international relations, and will then

Influence in history of psychology : What is the most important event, person, or influence in the history of psychology?

What does research regarding near-death experiences : What does research regarding Near-Death Experiences (NDEs) suggest about the nature of consciousness, the mind and the brain.

Who decides if a case will reach the supreme court : Who decides if a case will reach the Supreme Court? Why do you think they don't pick every case that is appealed to them

How are their confrontation and dialogue tied : What does each character represent? How are their confrontation and dialogue tied to questions of justice, obedience to the law, and gender dynamics

User Account

All Pages