Summarise and evaluate each paper

Reference no: EM132373866 , Length: word count:2000

Financial Accounting Assignment -

In a folder called "Assignment Papers and Rio Tinto Report" on Moodle, you will find 9 papers that address various aspects of sustainability and environmental reporting. Rio Tino's 2017 sustainability development report is also uploaded in this folder.

Required (word limit 2000 words)

1. Critically review any six of the nine papers;

2. Critically discuss the 2017 Rio Tinto sustainable development report.

Please note:

A critical review requires you to summarise and evaluate each paper.
To be critical does not mean to criticise in a negative way. It requires you to question the given information and view put forth by the author(s). It requires you to evaluate the issues raised in a paper.
Evaluation means presenting the strengths and weaknesses of a paper.
Overall, writing a critical review involves analysis and evaluation.

References -

Chapter 30 - Accounting for corporate social responsibility

Craig Deegan, (2016)

Note - In this assignment, you have to consider these six articles and write a critical review of 2000 words according to the requirements.

Articles -

1. Corporate governance and environmental reporting: an Australian study by Kathyayini Kathy Rao, Carol A. Tilt and Laurence H. Lester.

2. Corporate Social Responsibilities: Alternative Perspectives About the Need to Legislate by Craig Deegan and Marita Shelly.

3. Using sustainability reporting to assess the environmental footprint of copper mining by S. Northey, N. Haque and G. Mudd.

4. Environmental incidents in a developing country and corporate environmental disclosures A study of a multinational gas company by Muhammad Azizul Islam and Muhammad Aminul Islam.

5. Corporate social responsibility and the parameters of dialogue with vulnerable others by Robyn Mayes, Barbara Pini and Paula McDonald.

6. Environmentally sustainable mining: The case of tailings storage facilities by Erica Schoenberger.

Reference no: EM132373866

Questions Cloud

What are the ethical issues raised by the experiment : Does the experiment violate the guidelines articulated in APA Ethical Standard 8 dealing with research with human participants? In what ways?

Effectiveness of the discussion method in an introductory : A researcher plans a study to test the effectiveness of the discussion method in an introductory research methods course at the college level.

How can an administrator respond to reluctance : How can an administrator in a health care organization influence others in the organization to use data legally and ethically? How can an administrator.

Explain the processes involved in tracking : Explain the processes involved in Tracking, Measuring, and Evaluating your strategies - Each SM platform requires unique and customized tactics

Summarise and evaluate each paper : BUACC5934 Financial Accounting Assignment, Federation Business School, Australia. A critical review requires you to summarise and evaluate each paper

Investigate the scope of this waste management issue : Investigate the context and the scope of this waste management issue using all available published resources. How can you benefit from this approach? Any gaps

Future issues in it project management in a global context : ITECH7401 - Team Leadership Blog - Leadership in IT project management - Federation University - Research and critique current and future issues in IT project

Write about description of methods - random effect model : Write 1000-1500 words for description of methods used such as OLS, random effect model, Generalised movement method, Sargan J test and Housman Variables

Explain definition of a living will and its key components : Introduction: Explain the definition of a living will and its key components. This section will provide an educational overview of the document for the patient.

Reviews

len2373866

9/21/2019 12:54:04 AM

Word Count: 2000 words. In this assignment, you have to consider these six articles and write a critical review of 2000 words according to the marking guide and requirement file attached to the articles and the assignment below. An additional file says about how to write a Critical Review more clearly. Read the marking guide and requirement file and follow it strictly.

len2373866

9/21/2019 12:53:57 AM

This is a group assignment. Each group needs to have 3 or 4 members in it. Please organise each other into groups. If you do not wish to work in a group please discuss this with your lecturer. Further Additional Information - The following matters should be given particular attention: Your assignment must be submitted no later than the Friday ending week 10 of the semester. Assessment tasks submitted after the due date, without prior approval or arrangement, will be penalised by ten percent. Requests for extension of time must be made with your lecturer and based on Special Consideration guidelines.

len2373866

9/21/2019 12:53:51 AM

In your assignment use 12-pt times new roman font, use 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page and 1.5 line spacing. Remember to reference your writing, as well as a bibliography at the end of the report. This assignment must be handed in for successful completion of the course and will count as 30 marks towards the final mark. Marks have been allocated to each specific section of your assignment. All assignments are to be uploaded to Moodle.

Write a Review

Required(*) Message

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

User Account

All Pages