Presentation focused on only part of audience with a sporadic eye contact. The audience was distracted. Could be heard by only half of the audience. Body language was distracting. Presenter minimally contributing to the group efforts. Primarily prepared but with some dependence on just reading off slides. Spoke to majority of the audience with steady eye contact and at a suitable pace and volume. The audience was engaged by the presentation. Some fidgeting by the presenter. Slight domination of one presenter. Presenters helped each other. Very well prepared. Regular/constant eye contact. The audience was engaged, and the presenter held the audience’s attention. Appropriate speaking volume & body language. All presenters knew the information, participated equally, and helped each other as needed. Extremely prepared and rehearsed.

Presentation 10% No eye contact. Inappropriate body language. Difficult to understand. No effort made to keep the audience engaged. Little use of presentation aids or materials used were irrelevant. Presenters not cooperating with each other. No evident rehearsal prior to presenting. Minimal eye contact with focus on a small part of the audience. The audience was not engaged. Spoke too quickly or quietly making it difficult to understand. Inappropriate/disinterested body language. Unbalanced presentation or tension resulting from over- helping. {resenter not participating. Evident lack of preparation/rehearsal. Dependence on slides.

Effective conclusions were partially provided. Specific data or facts were occasionally referred when necessary to support the analysis and conclusions. Adequate grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax. The document is referenced but some referencing is missing. Effective conclusions were provided. Specific data or facts were referred to when necessary to support the analysis and conclusions. Excellent grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax. The document was properly referenced with both reference list and in text references.

Correct citation of key resources and evidence 10% Overall structure, appearance and referencing of the report are assessed. Effective conclusions were not provided. Specific data or facts necessary to support the analysis and conclusions were not provided. Very badly written, incorrect grammar, inappropriate language used, no proper structure of the document, badly organised with no logical flow of the arguments. The document is missing in text referencing and/or a reference list. Limited conclusions were provided. Specific data or facts necessary to support the analysis and conclusions were not provided. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing and syntax needs significant improvement. The document is very poorly referenced. Effective conclusions were provided in some areas. Specific data or facts were not referred when necessary to support the analysis and conclusions. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax needs improvement. The document is partially referenced, reference list or in text referencing is missing.

Application of Framework 40% SLO addressed: b) Identify and apply appropriate frameworks and tools to the problems and challenges Demonstrates no understanding of the framework and concepts relevant to the data analysis. Demonstrates little understanding of the framework and concepts relevant to the data analysis. Demonstrates good knowledge of the framework and concepts relevant to the data analysis. Demonstrates correct knowledge of the framework and concepts relevant to the data analysis. Demonstrates correct and complete knowledge of the framework and concepts relevant to the data analysis.

Data Analysis using Excel 40% SLO addressed: a) Examine the statistical analysis through Excel Limited or no understanding of the statistical data analysis. Identifies a proportion of the understanding of the statistical data analysis. Identifies a majority of the understanding of the statistical data analysis. Correctly identifies all of the analytical techniques and understanding of the statistical data analysis. Not only identifies all of the analytical techniques with good understanding of the statistical data analysis.

Distinction (Advanced) (75-84) High Distinction (Exceptional) (85-100) Distinction is awarded for work of superior quality in achieving all learning outcomes and a superior integration and understanding of theory and application of skills. Evidence of in-depth research, reading, analysis and evaluation is demonstrated. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. High Distinction is awarded for work of outstanding quality in achieving all learning outcomes together with outstanding integration and understanding of theory and application of skills. Evidence of in-depth research, reading, analysis, original and creative thought is demonstrated. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged.

Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) (0-49) Pass (Functional) (50-64) Credit (Proficient) (65-74) Grade Description (Grading Scheme) Fail grade will be awarded if a student is unable to demonstrate satisfactory academic performance in the subject or has failed to complete required assessment points in accordance with the subject’s required assessment points. Pass is awarded for work showing a satisfactory achievement of all learning outcomes and an adequate understanding of theory and application of skills. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. Credit is awarded for work showing a more than satisfactory achievement of all learning outcomes and a more than adequate understanding of theory and application of skills. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged.