Recommendations (8%) critique of how the author(s) evaluated and made connections between current literature & the present study, the writer(s) further assessed how the author(s) presented their research as impacting a body of knowledge, and the benefits of this new knowledge. Strengths/ Limitations (8%) The writer(s) presented a thorough and concise assessment of the strengths and limitations of the article. Application to Practice (8%) The writer(s) presented a thorough and concise critique of the researcher(s) presentation of how their results can be applied to practice. Writing style (9%) Written in scholarly language (accurate,

section to provide an understanding of how the author’s conducted their research and whether the writer(s) believed it was well presented in their writing. *codes, categories, themes, etc. Ethical Considerations (8%) The writer(s) presented a thorough and concise critique of how the author(s) presented this section in their research (if applicable). Results (8%) The writer(s) presented a thorough and concise critique of how the author(s) presented the results. The writer(s) presented their assessment on whether the results did in fact answer the RQ/problem and whether the results were supported in the literature. Conclusions/ Discussion & The writer(s) presented a thorough and concise

Literature Review (8%) The writer(s) presented a thorough and concise critique of the literature review by reviewing that literature was relevant, current, organized, and from what sources it came from. The writers included their assessment on whether the author(s) established the importance of their research by conveying how previous research has not focused on this particular topic. Research Problem/ Question (8%) The writer(s) presented a thorough and concise critique of the research problem/question(s). The writer(s) included their assessment of the clarity & conciseness of the problem or question and whether it was explicit or it had to be inferred. Methodology/ Approach: Sample, Data collection/Data Analysis (8%) The writer(s) presented a thorough and concise critique of the following sections: Participants, data collection & data analysis. Enough content was added per

Criteria Excellent Title (3%) Title was correctly formatted in APA Abstract (8%) Writer(s) presented a thorough and concise critique of the abstract by adding detail and maximizing understanding. Introduction/ Background (Student is the writer) (8%) Writer(s) presented a thorough and concise critique of how the author(s) introduced their research taking into consideration the current body of literature. Purpose of Study (8%) The writer(s) presented a thorough and concise critique of the purpose of the study by expanding on how the author(s) introduced their research as important and significant.

Use your own words - DO NOT cut and paste ANYTHING from the Internet DO NOT DO ANY RESEARCH PLEASE - this assignment will continue. Answer all the questions and give CRITIQUE. Critique definition: "the act of criticizing" or a "remark or comment that expresses disapproval," but it can also refer to the activity of making judgments about the qualities of books, movies, etc. (as in "literary criticism").Critique is a somewhat formal word that typically refers to a careful judgment in which someone gives an opinion about something. Review can refer to an essay analyzing a literary or artistic work, but can also sometimes imply a more casual or personal opinion.