Reference no: EM133296215

Question:- National Pork Producers Council v. Ross and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina are two cases currently pending before the United States Supreme Court. You will choose one of them and write a short paper analyzing the case (covering all the specific issues detailed below) and stating a reasoned conclusion for how you think the case should be decided. 

State the primary legal question presented in the case; and Identify the petitioner and describe the key arguments made by the petitioner, including the rationale and authority underlying each argument; and  Identify the respondent and describe the key arguments made by the respondent, including the rationale and authority underlying each argument; and Analyze and evaluate the strength, validity, and anticipated consequences of the arguments of each side to reach a reasoned conclusion about what decision you think the Supreme Court should reach on the primary legal question. When you conduct your analysis, make sure you address the arguments for and against your conclusion, including why the arguments supporting your conclusion are superior. Be sure that you do not simply announce your conclusion. Explain and support it, including why you rejected alternative conclusions. Your analysis should not only address the specific legal arguments, but also evaluate the ramifications on our culture/society generally of adopting one approach to the primary legal question versus the other.