State action is okay, 1.The Court says even racist policy

State action is okay

Reference no: EM13710230

QUESTION1

1.The Court says even racist policy that is state action is okay, as long as the state action does not treat one race worse than another.(choose)

a.Hall v. Decuir (1878)

b.Civil Rights Cases of 1883

c.Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

d.Giles v. Harris (1903)

e.Nixon v. Herndon (1927)

f.Nixon v. Condon (1932)

g.Grovey v. Townsend (1935)

h.Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada (1938)

i.Smith v. Allwright (1944)

j.Shelley v. Kraemer (1948)

k.Sweatt v. Painter (1950)

l.McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950)

m.Brown v. Board (1954)

n.Bailey v. Patterson (1962)

o.Heart of Atlanta Motel (1964)

p.Katzenbach v. McClung (1964)

QUESTION 2

This case was far-reaching in its logic because it said that even a tiny violation of equal protection by a state is unconstitutional.(CHOOSE)

Hall v. Decuir (1878)

Civil Rights Cases of 1883

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Giles v. Harris (1903)

Nixon v. Herndon (1927)

Nixon v. Condon (1932)

Grovey v. Townsend (1935)

Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada (1938)

Smith v. Allwright (1944)

Shelley v. Kraemer (1948)

Sweatt v. Painter (1950)

McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950)

Brown v. Board (1954)

Bailey v. Patterson (1962)

Heart of Atlanta Motel (1964)

Katzenbach v. McClung (1964)

QUESTION 3

The Court refuses to put black voters back on the voting registration rolls.(choose)

Hall v. Decuir (1878)

Civil Rights Cases of 1883

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Giles v. Harris (1903)

Nixon v. Herndon (1927)

Nixon v. Condon (1932)

Grovey v. Townsend (1935)

Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada (1938)

Smith v. Allwright (1944)

Shelley v. Kraemer (1948)

Sweatt v. Painter (1950)

McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950)

Brown v. Board (1954)

Bailey v. Patterson (1962)

Heart of Atlanta Motel (1964)

Katzenbach v. McClung (1964)

QUESTION 4

The Court says a state law is unconstitutional because it is acting in interstate commerce, which is a federal policy area.(choose)

Hall v. Decuir (1878)

Civil Rights Cases of 1883

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Giles v. Harris (1903)

Nixon v. Herndon (1927)

Nixon v. Condon (1932)

Grovey v. Townsend (1935)

Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada (1938)

Smith v. Allwright (1944)

Shelley v. Kraemer (1948)

Sweatt v. Painter (1950)

McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950)

Brown v. Board (1954)

Bailey v. Patterson (1962)

Heart of Atlanta Motel (1964)

Katzenbach v. McClung (1964)

QUESTION 5

The Court strikes down the Separate but Equal doctrine in public education.(choose)

Hall v. Decuir (1878)

Civil Rights Cases of 1883

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Giles v. Harris (1903)

Nixon v. Herndon (1927)

Nixon v. Condon (1932)

Grovey v. Townsend (1935)

Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada (1938)

Smith v. Allwright (1944)

Shelley v. Kraemer (1948)

Sweatt v. Painter (1950)

McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950)

Brown v. Board (1954)

Bailey v. Patterson (1962)

Heart of Atlanta Motel (1964)

Katzenbach v. McClung (1964)

QUESTION 6

The Court says that primary elections are part of general elections, and therefore any racial discrimination by a party in its primary elections is state action in violation of the 15th Amendment, by definition.(choose)

Hall v. Decuir (1878)

civil Rights Cases of 1883

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Giles v. Harris (1903)

Nixon v. Herndon (1927)

Nixon v. Condon (1932)

Grovey v. Townsend (1935)

Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada (1938)

Smith v. Allwright (1944)

Shelley v. Kraemer (1948)

Sweatt v. Painter (1950)

McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950)

Brown v. Board (1954)

Bailey v. Patterson (1962)

Heart of Atlanta Motel (1964)

Katzenbach v. McClung (1964)

QUESTION 7

Even though a vote in a party's primary elections is not a vote for state or federal office, the Court says that a state law that gives a party's executive committee the right to decide on voting restrictions for its own party primary elections is state action in violation of the 15th Amendment.(choose)

Hall v. Decuir (1878)

Civil Rights Cases of 1883

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Giles v. Harris (1903)

Nixon v. Herndon (1927)

Nixon v. Condon (1932)

Grovey v. Townsend (1935)

Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada (1938)

Smith v. Allwright (1944)

Shelley v. Kraemer (1948)

Sweatt v. Painter (1950)

McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950)

Brown v. Board (1954)

Bailey v. Patterson (1962)

Heart of Atlanta Motel (1964)

Katzenbach v. McClung (1964)

QUESTION 8

The Court says it does matter if blacks feel that their state government is following a doctrine that says they are inferior, if that feeling harms their education.(choose)

Hall v. Decuir (1878)

Civil Rights Cases of 1883

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Giles v. Harris (1903)

Nixon v. Herndon (1927)

Nixon v. Condon (1932)

Grovey v. Townsend (1935)

Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada (1938)

Smith v. Allwright (1944)

Shelley v. Kraemer (1948)

Sweatt v. Painter (1950)

McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950)

Brown v. Board (1954)

Bailey v. Patterson (1962)

Heart of Atlanta Motel (1964)

Katzenbach v. McClung (1964)

QUESTION 9

At the time this case was decided, federal policy was the same as the state law in question. Despite this, the Court struck down the state law in question because it disagreed with what federal policy had been at the time of the incident that sparked the case.(choose)

Hall v. Decuir (1878)

Civil Rights Cases of 1883

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Giles v. Harris (1903)

Nixon v. Herndon (1927)

Nixon v. Condon (1932)

Grovey v. Townsend (1935)

Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada (1938)

Smith v. Allwright (1944)

Shelley v. Kraemer (1948)

Sweatt v. Painter (1950)

McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950)

Brown v. Board (1954)

Bailey v. Patterson (1962)

Heart of Atlanta Motel (1964)

Katzenbach v. McClung (1964)

QUESTION 10

The Court says a federal law is unconstitutional because that federal law forbids certain racist actions even though they are not state action.(choose)

Hall v. Decuir (1878)

Civil Rights Cases of 1883

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Giles v. Harris (1903)

Nixon v. Herndon (1927)

Nixon v. Condon (1932)

Grovey v. Townsend (1935)

Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada (1938)

Smith v. Allwright (1944)

Shelley v. Kraemer (1948)

Sweatt v. Painter (1950)

McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950)

Brown v. Board (1954)

Bailey v. Patterson (1962)

Heart of Atlanta Motel (1964)

Katzenbach v. McClung (1964)

Reference no: EM13710230

Questions Cloud

Race is a social construct which we have created : As Schaefer (2012) notes, race is a social construct which we have created ( p. 12). On page 35, it is noted that prejudice is learned and is yet another environmental/social construct that we teach in this society (Schaefer, 2012). Most peop..

Difference between stereotyping and racial profiling : What is the difference between stereotyping and racial profiling? Both are perceived as negative; however, can you think of an instance where racial profiling might be useful?

Did your knowledge of job study and its processes impact : Did your knowledge of job study and its processes impact your final plan and None of the employees has any formal HRM education and very few have even attended HRM seminars

Bureaucracy''s rule making powers is least accurate : Which of the following statements about the federal bureaucracy's rule making powers is LEAST accurate? Select one:a. Bureaucratic agencies are often tasked with drafting specific rules to meet general guidelines established by Congress.b. The public..

State action is okay : 1.The Court says even racist policy that is state action is okay, as long as the state action does not treat one race worse than another.(choose)a.Hall v. Decuir (1878)b.Civil Rights Cases of 1883c.Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) d.Giles v. Harri..

What is the expected value of the sample mean : What is the probability that a diner is an undergraduate and has bought a meal and what is the probability that someone who has bought a meal is a postgraduate?

Draw a diagram of the arrangemen : A uniform metre rule can be balanced at 70.0 cm mark when a mass 0.05kg id hung from the 94.0cm mark. a. draw a diagram of the arrangement b. find the mass of the metre scale

Temperaturetof the soda and watermelon in degrees celsius. : An ice chest at a beach party contains 12 cans of soda at 2.90 °C. Each can of soda has a mass of 0.35 kg and a specific heat capacity of 3800 J/(kg C°). Someone adds a 9.12-kg watermelon at 27.5 °C to the chest.

Find g on this extra-solar planet : 1. If vector U= 3i + 4j, vector V= 5 k and vector W= 4i - 3j, find the angle between U and V-W . 2. At the same time that ball X rolls off a platform on an airless extra-solar planet 8.00 meters high at a speed of 6.00 m/s, ball Y is dropped from..

User Account

All Pages