"I really would like to say thank you for all that you have done to assist me with keeping my stress levels low. Working with you guys is always soothing. thank you so much. good handled." Yes, It is perfect work. thanks a lot.

Research Weighting 25% No authoritative sources, no evidence of research or not relevant for the task. Very limited understanding. The research has not been linked to the main text. Less than 2 authoritative sources or sources are not relevant for the task. Limited understanding. Little evidence of meaningful integration of the research with the main text. 2-3 scholarly sources. Some sources lack relevance or authority but are still appropriate for the task. Adequate understanding. The research could be incorporated with the main text more consistently. 3-4 scholarly sources. Sources are mostly well-chosen, authoritative and appropriate for the task. Good understanding. The research is integrated with the main text. 4-5 scholarly sources. Sources are well- chosen, authoritative and are appropriate for the task. Excellent understanding. The research is very well integrated with the main text.

Organisation/ logic Weighting 5% No flow. No argument. Poorly organised and difficult to read. Does not flow logically from one part to another. The argument is not clear. Generally well organised although the flow of the argument is not always logical. Argument is clear and mostly sound. Coherently organised and logical formation of sound argument. Exceptionally well structured. Logic is easy to follow. Arguments are sound and convincing. Writing Weighting 5% No consideration for presentation. Muddled writing that is very difficult to follow. Numerous grammatical errors. Multiple spelling errors. Acceptable presentation. Long winded and some clear writing presentation. Some grammatical errors. Multiple spelling errors. Tidy presentation. Mostly clear writing but at times long winded. Writing style lacks consideration. Few issues around grammar. Less than 5 spelling errors. Professional presentation. Clear writing mainly to the point. Considered writing style. Excellent grammar with only minor oversights. Less than 3 spelling errors. Polished presentation. Clear and concise writing.

Social relationships – the effect of gender Communication styles of women Weighting 30% The communication styles of women are not discussed with any clarity. No examples are included to illustrate the communication styles of women The communication styles of women are not covered adequately. Examples given do not adequately represent the effect of gender. The links between discussion point and examples are not clear. The communication styles of women are explored and assessed adequately. The example given clearly illustrate the points made. More detail and discussion would improve the response. The communication styles of women and the examples given demonstrate an in depth knowledge of the effect of gender in social relationships in the team context. Some interesting points of view included. Good selection of relevant examples included The communication styles of women and the examples given demonstrate an insightful and multi- dimensional knowledge of the effect of gender in social relationships in the team context. Discussion points and examples well beyond the obvious. Excellence.

Criteria E (0-39) D (40-49) C (50-64) B (65-79) A (80-100) Social relationships the effect of gender – Communication styles of men Weighting 30% The communication styles of men are not discussed with any clarity. No examples are included to illustrate the communication styles of men The communication styles of men are not covered adequately. Examples given do not adequately represent the effect of gender. The links between discussion point and examples are not clear. The communication styles of men are explored and assessed adequately. The example given clearly illustrate the points made. More detail and discussion would improve the response. The communication styles of men and the examples given demonstrate an in depth knowledge of the effect of gender in social relationships in the team context. Some interesting points of view included. Good selection of relevant examples included The communication styles of men and the examples given demonstrate an insightful and multi- dimensional knowledge of the effect of gender in social relationships in the team context. Discussion points and examples well beyond the obvious. Excellence.

Paper Number and Title: MGT105 – Business Communication Level 5, 15 credits, Learning outcome: No 3. Learning outcome 3. Discuss the social and cultural aspects of communication within teams. Conditions: This is a compulsory assignment. It must be submitted and it makes up 15% of your final result for this paper. The completed assignment is to be submitted to your facilitator via Blackboard by the due date.