Reference no: EM131914688
Case Study Discussion 2
Instructions
1 Review Chapter 4:
Leadership and Vision and the Case examples - Visionary Leadership at the Generics Group in Gill (2012), pp 108-135. Respond to the questions in about 250 words:
a Is vision just a dream?
b How can you create a vision that all stakeholders will share?
c How can you ensure that people throughout the organization understand and are committed to the vision?
d Should the vision be attainable or not quite attainable?
e How could Generics Group's vision have been sustained?
Use Readings of the week to address the questions above by citing and referencing them in your post per academic writing requirements. Your initial post is due by 11:59 p.m. Thursday of Session 1.
Read and respond to at least 2 of your classmates'/ lecturer's postings by 11:59 p.m. Sunday .
Your postings should also be well developed by providing clear answers with evidence of critical thinking and add depth to the discussion.
Case Study Discussion 3
Instructions
1 Read Integrative case study: Teamwork in China: a cultural challenge? In Iszatt-White & Saunders (2014), pp101 - 102.
2 Navigate to the threaded discussion below and respond to Iszatt-White & Saunders' questions in 300 words minimum:
a How would you advise your Board of Directors in relation to their desire to introduce team working into their plants in China? What do you think would be the benefits and challenges of such a move?
b As the proposed expatriate general manager of the Chinese plant, how would you go about introducing teams and team working to the plant? What would you want to know about the employees and about surrent working practices before making the change?
c How would you practice ‘team leadership' in this context, and how might this differ from team leadership in a more individualistic culture? More generally, how transferable do you think this style of leadership is to other cultures?
Use Readings of the week to address the questions above by citing and referencing them in your post per academic writing requirements. Your initial post is due by 11:59 p.m. Thursday of Session 1.
Read and respond to at least 2 of your classmates'/ lecturer's postings by 11:59 p.m. Sunday .
Your postings should also be well developed by providing clear answers with evidence of critical thinking and add depth to the discussion.
Case Study Discussion 4
Instruction
1 Read Integrative case study: General Mills leadership development (pdf attached)
2 Navigate to the threaded discussion below and respond to the questions at the end of the case in 300 words minimum.
Use Readings of the week to address the questions above by citing and referencing them in your post per academic writing requirements.
Your initial post is due by 11:59 p.m. Thursday of Session 1.
Read and respond to at least 2 of your classmates'/ lecturer's postings by 11:59 p.m. Sunday .
Your postings should also be well developed by providing clear answers with evidence of critical thinking and add depth to the discussion.
Case Study Discussion 5
Case-Study Discussion Forum: Responsible leadership
Instructions
1 Read Integrative case study: Aditya Birla Group in Iszatt-White & Saunders (2017), pp 275-277.
2 Navigate to the threaded discussion below and respond to Iszatt-White & Saunders' questions in 300 words minimum:
a What strikes you about the social activities of the group?
b Do you think the approach of the Aditya Birla Group is one that could be easily copied?
c What part does leadership have to play in the development of such an integrated approach to business and society?
d From what you have learned about Mrs. Rajashree Birla, write a short definition of responsible leadership for a sustainable world.
Use Readings of the week to address the questions above by citing and referencing them in your post per academic writing requirements. Your initial post is due by 11:59 p.m. Thursday of Session 1.
Read and respond to at least 2 of your classmates'/ lecturer's postings by 11:59 p.m. Sunday .
Your postings should also be well developed by providing clear answers with evidence of critical thinking and add depth to the discussion.