Should the senate have been allowed to ignore

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics
Reference no: EM133362379

Article III of the Constitution provides that Federal judges are selected by the President, with the "advice and consent" of the Senate.

On March 16, 2016, President Barack Obama (a Democrat) nominated Merrick Garland for Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States to succeed Antonin Scalia, who had died one month earlier.

This vacancy arose during President Obama's final year as president, and shortly after Scalia's death was announced. Republican Senate leaders declared that because Scalia's seat had become vacant during an election year, the Senate would not even consider a nomination from the president. Senate Democrats criticized the move as being unprecedented and responded saying that there was sufficient time to vote on a nominee before the election.

Garland's nomination expired at the end of President Obama's final year in office. President Obama's successor, Donald Trump (a Republican), nominated Judge Neil Gorsuch to fill the vacancy on January 31, 2017, soon after taking office and Gorsuch was approved by the Republican led Senate.

Question 1. Why are modern Supreme Court nominations so contentious? What is at stake?

Question 2. Should the Senate have been allowed to ignore President Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland? Should they at least have given him a hearing? Explain

Reference no: EM133362379

Questions Cloud

Qualitative matrix to quantitative matrix : Compare the strengths and weaknesses of the qualitative matrix to the quantitative matrix,
Discuss at least two patient-care technologies : Discuss at least two patient-care technologies that would assist in the care of patients suffering from asthma and COPD.
Provide a safe and secure environment without compromising : provide a safe and secure environment without compromising the rights of registered guests who have been granted a license to use a hotel room
Why are all of the characters talking to one another : Why are all of the characters talking to one another (what prompts the conversation)? What do the characters agree about with regard to the research topic?
Should the senate have been allowed to ignore : Should the Senate have been allowed to ignore President Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland? Should they at least have given him a hearing
What is shared governance in healthcare : What is shared governance in healthcare? How will this model help you perform your duties as a nurse executive?
Widget price increases have y wanting to get out : LAW 330 College of Wooster As it turned out, widget price increases have Y wanting to get out of his commitment to sell widgets to X. Discuss
How can max brooks novel world war z serve as a metaphor : How can Max Brooks' novel World War Z serve as a metaphor for our country's current response towards climate change in order to make a social commentary
Resources or activities to encourage skill development : Creates resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improve initiative on medication administration

Reviews

Write a Review

Business Law and Ethics Questions & Answers

  Identify and distinguish the law that governs the business

Examine and differentiate the key features of the Australian legal system and identify and distinguish the law that governs the business environment

  Calculation of value reports as reliable

If some Courts accept the Calculation of Value reports as reliable, how did the valuation analyst navigate?

  Explain two different types of intellectual property

Discuss and explain two different types of intellectual property which may be related to this contract negotiation

  What is the overall perception of the police officers

What are the current strengths or excellent points of the police department? What are areas that are faults or problems in the police department? How well do the officers get along/relate (or not) with members of the public? What is the overall perce..

  Which of the following is not an immediate input provided

a codified law is known as aa deviant act.b statute.c theory.d crime.2 according to john f. galliher legal definitions

  Explain who is correct in given contention

Hodge denies this and sues for specific performance, claiming that Voeller had actual and apparent authority to bind the partnership. The partners argue that Voeller had no such authority and that Hodge knew this. Who is correct? Explain.

  Problem related to the law and ethics

For your course research paper, you will choose a topic based upon compliance standards related to health information initiatives in medical law and ethics.

  Why the renegotiated contract should be enforced

Give an economic argument why the renegotiated contract should be enforced in the second scenario, while the original contract should be enforced in the first

  Why did the police feel comfortable in leaving the scene

Evaluate the duty, breach of duty, and foreseeability issues in the Long Island stampede - Can someone be convicted for crimes related to conduct that is not illegal? Was the mens rea present here?

  What potential ethics are involved in that situation

Choose one situation and determine what potential ethics are involved in that situation. Discuss what you would do in this situation. Explain your reasoning

  Theories of motivation affect criminal justice organizations

Using the Criminal Justice Motivational Theories Matrix, explain how one or more theories of motivation affect criminal justice organizations

  Are performance evaluations required by law

Care in this type of setting is delivered by physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and advanced practice professionals.

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd