Share your chosen rhetorical artifact

Reference no: EM133605226

Question 1: Share your chosen rhetorical artifact. Share a URL and/or citation of that artifact.

Question 2: Describe the modalities of the artifact (e.g., visual, sonic, and verbal).

Question 3: Say a little bit about your favorite way to get information. Are you a visually based learner? Do yo prefer sound? Or do you prefer reading?

Reference no: EM133605226

Questions Cloud

What factors would you look at : what factors would you look at? For example, do you make the product or have someone else produce it for you? Do you have any examples of things that companies

What aspects of this theory would be most suitable : What aspects of this theory would be most suitable for your practice? Why? What aspects of this theory do you find problematic in terms of your knowledge

Analyze multimedia similar to a discussion exercise : I am giving you broad latitude; you may either create a work or analyze multimedia(s) similar to a discussion exercise.

Which evidentiary standard regarding scientific testimony : This case is apparently held in a state that is adhering to which evidentiary standard regarding scientific testimony?

Share your chosen rhetorical artifact : Share your chosen rhetorical artifact. Share a URL and/or citation of that artifact and Describe the modalities of the artifact (e.g., visual, sonic)

What is the connection between processes and threads : What is a thread? What is the connection between processes and threads? Why are threads important to modern operating systems?

Male with known ventricular septal defect : A 2-year-old male with known ventricular septal defect (VSD) presents for a well child exam. He has been followed by cardiology since age 2 weeks.

What do you think the action symbolizes culturally : What do you think the action symbolizes culturally? How do you know the action conveys cultural meaning? How did you learn its meaning

Does not that compensate for whatever bad they do : What is your position? Do you side more with Norberg, or with Bakan and Abbott? Whatever position you take is fine, as long as you back it with evidence

User Account

All Pages