Reference no: EM132361907

Golf Robots. Serious golfers and golf equipment companies sometimes make use of golf equipment test labs to obtain precise information about particular club heads, club shafts, and golf balls. One golfer requested  information about the Jazz Fat Cat 5-iron from Golf Laboratories, Inc. The company tested the club by using a robot to hit a Titleist NXT Tour ball six times with a head velocity of 85 miles per hour. The golfer wanted a club that, on average, would hit the ball more than 180 yards at that club speed. The total yards each ball traveled was 180, 187, 181, 182, 185, 181. At the 5% significance level, is there evidence to conclude that the club does what the golfer wants? (Note: The sample mean and sample standard deviation of the data are 182.7 yards and 2.7 yards, respectively and you may assume the variable total yards traveled is approximately normal.)

Using a hypothesis test to test this claim, which of the following is true? If there is a function on the ti84 on how to solve this question. Please say!

A)  Reject the null hypothesis of M=180 with a P-value between 2.5% and 5%. There is sufficient  evidence to conclude that the club, on average, would hit the ball more than 180 yards.

B)  Fail to reject the null hypothesis of M=180 with a P-value between 2.5% and 5%. There is not  sufficient evidence to conclude that the club, on average, would hit the ball more than 180 yards.

C)  Fail to reject the null hypothesis of M=180 with a P-value between 5 and 10%. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the club, on average, would hit the ball more than 180 yards.

D)  Reject the null hypothesis of M=180 with a P-value 5% and 10%. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the club, on average, would hit the ball more than 180 yards.