Word count / Time provided: 3500 -4000 words. Marking Information: The Portfolio will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 10% of the total unit mark. Part 1 (15% marks: submission 10% + presentation 5%)- Word limit: 1000-1200 words (excluding references and appendix) Presentation 5% (due week 4 - week 5, during tutorial) Penalty for Late submission: a deduction of 5% of the total mark shall be imposed on each of the next subsequent days. Marking Criteria and Rubric for Part 1 Submission: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 10% of the total unit mark - The report has fully and creatively addressed all the main objectives. Referencing of supporting literature in the modelling of the business processes for the project case, used is rigorous and enlightening. Indicates independent strongly argued coherent evidenced modelling with strong recommendations for ‘best practice' implementation.

Ideas are clear and insightful. The reader understands the argument through the precise presentation. Demonstrates advanced capacity to extend and to create new tools as recommendations for new RFP with all recommendations transparently described and detailed metrics included and perceives a sense of the wider context of the ides. The presentation and referencing is appropriate and consistent with the APA style guide and format. Marking Criteria and Rubric for Part 1 Presentation: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 5% of the total unit mark - Has excellent skills in communicating (writing) in project environment. There are no errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Information is clear and concise on each slide. Excellent visually appeal that is engaging.

Extensive comprehension knowledge of topic. Members showed complete understanding of the sleeted project and project scope statement. Accurately answered all questions posed. Has excellent skills in developing project scope statement. The presentation was a concise summary of the selected project. All questions answered. Comprehensive and complete coverage of information. Has excellent skills in oral communication. Excellent body language, speaking volume & regular eye contact. The audience was engaged, and presenters held the audience's attention. Significant group dynamics. All presenters participated equally and helped each other as needed. Very well prepared and rehearsed.

Part 2 (20% marks: submission 15% + presentation 5%) - Word limit: 1500-1800 words (excluding references and appendix) Presentation 5% (due week 8 - week 9, during tutorial) You need to present your work. Marking Criteria and Rubric for Part 2 Submission: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 15% of the total unit mark - The report has fully and creatively addressed all the main objectives. Comprehensive business process modelling techniques have been applied consistently and performance metrics discussed rigorously. Indicates independent strongly argued coherent evidenced modelling with strong recommendations for ‘best practice' implementation.

The report offers a comprehensive, lucid and convincing discussion of the functional and non- functional elements. An IS acquisition proposal is proposed with an exhaustive range of options. Evidence of strong capability and creativity has been demonstrated. Demonstrates advanced capacity to analyse and apply business modelling or design techniques and make recommendations for the acquisition of an IS system for a project case. Ideas are clear and insightful. The reader understands the argument through the precise presentation and perceives a sense of the wider context of the ides. The presentation and referencing is appropriate and consistent with the APA. Excellent style guide and format.

Marking Criteria and Rubric for Part 2 Presentation: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 5% of the total unit mark Has excellent skills in communicating (writing) in project environment There are no errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Information is clear and concise on each slide. Excellent visually appeal that is engaging. Extensive comprehension knowledge of topic. Members showed complete understanding of the sleeted project and project scope statement. Accurately answered all questions posed. Has excellent skills in developing project scope statement. The presentation was a concise summary of the selected project. All questions answered. Comprehensive and complete coverage of information. Has excellent skills in oral communication. Excellent body language, speaking volume & regular eye contact. The audience was engaged, and presenters held the audience's attention. Significant group dynamics. All presenters participated equally and helped each other as needed. Very well prepared and rehearsed.

Part 3 (15% marks: submission 10% + presentation 5%) - Word limit: 1500-1800 words (excluding references and appendix) Presentation 5% (due week 11 - week 12, during tutorial) Penalty for Late submission: a deduction of 5% of the total mark shall be imposed on each of the next subsequent days. Marking Criteria and Rubric for Part 3 Submission: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 10% of the total unit mark. The application and testing shows very strong capability and interpretation of the business processing requirements in the proposed system. Logical description of the application to ‘case project' is demonstrated in the walkthrough. Indicates independent strongly argued coherent evidenced modelling with strong recommendations for ‘best practice' implementation.

Ideas are clear and insightful. The reader understands the argument through the precise presentation and perceives a sense of the wider context of the ides. The presentation and referencing is appropriate and consistent with the APA style guide and format. Demonstrates advanced capacity to analyse and apply business modelling or design techniques and make recommendations for the acquisition of an IS system for a project case. Excellent style guide and format. Marking Criteria and Rubric for Part 3 Presentation: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 5% of the total unit mark - Has excellent skills in communicating (writing) in project environment There are no errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation.

Information is clear and concise on each slide. Excellent visually appeal that is engaging. Extensive comprehension knowledge of topic. Members showed complete understanding of the sleeted project and project scope statement. Accurately answered all questions posed. Has excellent skills in developing project scope statement. The presentation was a concise summary of the selected project. All questions answered. Comprehensive and complete coverage of information. Has excellent skills in oral communication. Excellent body language, speaking volume & regular eye contact. The audience was engaged, and presenters held the audience's attention. Significant group dynamics. All presenters participated equally and helped each other as needed. Assessment Details: Examination covering theory and practice in the course. Marking Information: The quiz will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 40% of the total unit mark.