The assignment was done very well, I like that the work is done on time and it is prepared based on the instructions provided by my university. My professor marked it as competent, I will approach expertsmind soon again for my next couple of assignments.

Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

20.0 %Evaluate the Role of Venture Capital in the Entrepreneurial Process Evaluation of the role of venture capital in the entrepreneurial process is not presented. Evaluation of the role of venture capital in the entrepreneurial process is present. Discussion is absent or inadequate. Evaluation of the role of venture capital in the entrepreneurial process is present, but done at a cursory level. Evaluation of the role of venture capital in the entrepreneurial process is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Evaluation of the role of venture capital in the entrepreneurial process is clearly presented. Discussion is thorough and insightfu

25.0 %Identify Ways in Which Each Form of Capital Serves to Maintain and Sustain Organizations or Businesses Over Time Identification of the ways in which each form of capital serves to maintain and sustain organizations or businesses over time is not present. Identification of the ways in which each form of capital serves to maintain and sustain organizations or businesses over time is present. Argument, and/or discussion, is absent or inadequate. Identification of the ways in which each form of capital serves to maintain and sustain organizations or businesses over time is present. but done at a cursory level. Identification of the ways in which each form of capital serves to maintain and sustain organizations or businesses over time is clearly presented. Argument supports claims and is convincing. Discussion is convincing. Identification of the ways in which each form of capital serves to maintain and sustain organizations or businesses over time is clearly presented. Argument supports claims and is insightful and convincing. Discussion is though and insightful

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 76.00% 3 Satisfactory 81.00% 4 Good 89.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content 25.0 %Summarize the Different Types of Capital, or Assets, Available to the Entrepreneur A summary of the different types of capital, or assets, available to the entrepreneur is not present. A summary of the different types of capital, or assets, available to the entrepreneur is present. Discussion is absent or inadequate. A summary of the different types of capital, or assets, available to the entrepreneur is present, but done at a superficial level. A summary of the different types of capital, or assets, available to the entrepreneur is clearly presented. Discussion is thorough. A summary of the different types of capital, or assets, available to the entrepreneur is clearly presented. Discussion is detailed and insightful.