Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Assignment: Research Paper Directions: Congratulations on all of the hard work! This week you will submit the final draft of your Proposal Paper. Be sure to review the Technical Communications Rubric for grading criteria. Complete instructions for the Research Paper can be found in Learning Plan 1 "Assignments" page. NOTE: Refer to the Technical Writing Rubric within this course. The criteria in this rubric differs from the criteria in the Writing Intensive Rubric found in other courses. Submit this assignment to your instructor via the dropbox "Research Paper." This assignment is worth 200 points. Rating Scale x Criteria = Total Points Final Paper Grading Criteria Ratings Ratings NAU adheres to a strict plagiarism policy which is outlined in the Student Handbook and the undergraduate catalog. Plagiarized papers will receive a failing grade; additional sanctions may be enforced. Exceptional 8 points A Proficient 6 points B Basic 4 points C Unsatisfactory 2 points D Absent 0 points F Category I. Research Segment (120 possible points / 60% of Total Score) 1. The research topic fits course and has been approved by the instructor. 2. The writer articulates a clear statement of purpose. 3. The writer's proposal is realistic and achievable. 4. The writer keeps the scope of the paper narrow enough to handle subject matter effectively. 5. The writer demonstrates appropriate level of technical expertise for the chosen topic. 6. The writing is well-organized. 7. Paragraphing is appropriate with central points made in each paragraph and includes a clear topic sentence. 8. Transitions are used to make smooth connections between ideas. 9. Research is drawn from at least six (6) peer-reviewed sources with no more than one non-juried Internet site being used. 10. The writer effectively used in-text citations when quoting or paraphrasing material. 11. The writer includes primary research and discusses his/her findings in the paper. 12. The writer integrates graphics to clarify the researcher's data. 13. The evidence is accurate and contains a balance of both generalities and specifics (e.g., explanations, anecdotes, statistics, etc.). 14. Overall the paper reflects college level writing skills. 15. The conclusion contains a summary of the findings and possible recommendations for future research. CATEGORY I - TOTAL POINTS __________________ (120 possible) Category II. Critical Thinking (40 possible points / 20% of Total Score) 16. The writer identifies and presents clear issues. 17. The writer relies on objective data to support his /her final assertion or claim. 18. The writer uses sound reasoning to support his/her final assertion or claim. 19. The writer provides enough information for the audience to understand the main ideas. 20. The author refrains from making claims without supporting evidence. CATEGORY II - TOTAL POINTS __________________ (40 possible) Category III. Components of Paper / Mechanics (40 possible points / 20% of Total Score) 21. Writing adheres to 6th edition APA style and form. 2. The paper is free from grammatical errors (e.g., dangling modifiers, subject-verb disagreement, verb tense shift, person shift, pronoun-antecedent disagreement, run-on sentences, comma splices, and diction errors). 23. The paper is 10-12 pages and includes the following: (2 points for each component) Transmittal Letter Title Page Table of Contents Informative Abstract (150-200 words) 24. The paper includes a separate Reference page that has cited all sources in correct APA format. 25. The entire Final Research Paper shows substantial improvement over the First Draft. (Note: 8 points may be awarded in this category if the student submitted an outstanding First Draft where only minor or no revisions were needed). CATEGORY III - TOTAL POINTS __________________ (40 possible) Total possible points from Categories I, II, and III (200 points) FINAL GRADE (Note: a plagiarized paper receives 0 points) LP11.2 Assignment: Proposal Presentation Directions: To capitalize on your final project, you need to prepare a PowerPoint presentation (or you may use another presentation software) guiding the viewer through your proposal project. You will post your proposal presentation in the discussion boards so your peers can view it as well as in the dropbox so it can be graded. The PowerPoint presentation should include: 1.8-10 slides (including a Title page slide and Reference page slide) 2.Discussion of the purpose of your proposal. 3.Discussion on the intended audience of your proposal. 4.Discussion of your primary research methods. 5.Discussion of your primary and secondary research findings. 6.PowerPoint is organized in a logical manner. 7.PowerPoint displays effective use of visual components. 8.PowerPoint slides are clear and easy to read. 9.PowerPoint is free of grammar and spelling errors. 10.PowerPoint is submitted on time.
Describe the Milgram study in detail including who were the teacher and the learner. What was the independent variable and dependent variables? What were the findings?
Compare and contrast natural law theory with virtue ethics. In your response, define each theory. Discuss how they might be similar and how they might be different. Provide examples that demonstrate your key points.
I have a seminar facilation and I need question to ask on John Locke's "Second Treatis of government" chapter (1-9) and Thomas Hobbes "leviathan" (Chapters 5 through 15). Good questions that can start a debate.
Star A has a parallex angle of 0.02 second of arc and Star B has a parallex angle of 0.008 second of arc. Both stars have the same apparent brightness. Which star has the grater luminosity and why?
Compare and contrast primary and secondary waves. How are they used to determine the nature of the layers of earth?
Do you think that the threat of terrorism in the U.S. justifies the imposition of limits on the rights of privacy? Generally, in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, should Americans allow the federal government to listen to their p..
What examples of functional strategies do you see in this case? Label these examples and give specific descriptions of them. As a company grows what challenges might it face in replicating in different locations that made it successful? How might the..
As the sample size increases, what happens to the likelihood of rejecting the null hypothesis and what happens to measures of effect size such as r2 and Cohen’s d?
Upper edge of a "quarter pipe," a track that is one-quarter of a circle with a radius of 2.50 . What speed does he need at the bottom?
Based on your learnings over the past six weeks, identify the factors that will be required for future change in the health care industry pertaining to quality improvement, patient safety, and risk management. What are the obstacles in improving qual..
what is the roche limit of a planet and its role in the formation of ring systems? what would happen to an astronaut
Explain how the concept of holiness emerges in the dialogue and why it takes a prominent position in the conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro.
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd