There are some errors, but much of the text, title page, and references page is consistent with the APA format. Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly with few exceptions. Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed with few exceptions. Assignment has few spelling and/or proofreading errors. Overall style is adequate for formal, professional work; some areas need style improvement. Text, title page, and references page are consistent with APA format. Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly. Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed. Assignment is spellchecked and proofread. Overall style is demonstrates excellent consistency with that expected of formal, professional work. 20% 0.00

Methodology Methodology is not applied to a specific population. NA NA Methodology is properly applied to a specific population. 10% 0.00 Format/Style APA format is not utilized. No obvious attempt made to cite ideas and information from other sources. There are consistent and repeated errors in rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation. There are consistent and repeated spelling and/or proofreading errors. Overall style is not at all consistent with formal, professional work. There are frequent repeated errors in consistency of the text, title page, and references page with APA format. There are numerous errors in which ideas and information from other sources are not cited correctly. There are numerous errors in rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation. There are numerous spelling and/or proofreading errors. Overall style is inadequate for formal, professional work; many areas needs need style improvement.

No literature review is included. Review is not comprehensive, little evidence of critical analysis and nursing research. Review is present but not comprehensive, nursing studies poorly represented, little evidence of critical analysis. Provides appropriate literature support, derived from nursing scholarly journals and other social science literature, as evidence for their chosen screening. Discussion demonstrates critical analysis of strengths and weaknesses of the chosen screening methodology. 25% 0.00 No literature review is included. Provides 1 scholarly source for literature support. Provides 3-2 scholarly sources for literature support. Provides 4 or more scholarly sources for literature support. 10% 0.00

Unit 2: Individual Screening Introductory Emergent Practiced Proficient/Mastered Score Weight Final Score 0 -1.9 2 - 2.9 3 - 3.9 4 Condition and screening Condition or type of screening methodology is not identified. Condition and type of screening methodology is selected but not clearly defined and has errors. Condition and type of screening methodology is selected but not clearly defined. Condition and type of screening methodology is clearly defined. 10% 0.00 Guidelines followed National Clearinghouse guidelines are not selected or identified. National Clearinghouse guidelines are not applied appropriately to the screening methodology. Detail is limited. National Clearinghouse guidelines are identified; detail is limited. National Clearinghouse guidelines are identified and are relevant to the screening methodology. 25% 0.00