Solution-Research your selected case on austlii

Research your selected case on austlii

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics

Reference no: EM131216243 , Length:

Instructions:

1. Form a group of between three and five students.

2. Select a case from one of the cases below.

3. Advise your lecturer by email of your group members and case selected. PLEASE NOTE: Lecturer approval is required. You must NOT start on your assignment until your lecturer approves your group and case. No approval = Fail.

4. Select the party you wish to represent ie. Plaintiff or Defendant; or ASIC or Defendant.

5. Research your selected case on Austlii.

6. Read and understand your selected case.

7. Prepare and present a summary of the case and your selected party's arguments.

8. All members MUST present.

9. Total marks for this assignment is 20 marks, and total weight for this assignment is 20%.

10. Time limit is 5 - 10 minutes per group.

BUSINESS LAW CASES

1. Nagel v Rottnest Island Authority (1993)

2. Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre v Anzil (2000)

3. Roads and Traffic Authority v Dederer (2007)

4. Esanda Finance v Peat Marwick Hungerfords (1997)

5. Fallas v Mourlas (2006)

6. Rogers v Whitaker (1992)

7. Caltex Oil v Dredge (1976)

8. Perre v Apand (1999)

9. L Shaddock v Parramatta City Council (1982)

10. Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980)

11. Hawkins v Clayton (1988)

12. Koehler v Cerebos (Aust) Ltd (2005)

13. Horne v Queensland (1995)

14. Peter Joseph Haylen v NSW Rugby Union Ltd (2002)

15. Flavel v State of SA (2008)

16. Tame v NSW (2001)

17. Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd (2001)

18. Hackshaw v Shaw (1984)

19. Baker v Gilbert (2003)

20. Australian Safeway Stores v Zaluzna (1987)

CORPORATIONS LAW CASES

1. Forrest v ASIC (2014)

2. ASIC v Citigroup (2007)

3. ASIC v Soust (2010)

4. North v Marra Developments Ltd (1981)

5. Fame Decorator Agencies Pty Ltd v Jeffries Industries Ltd (1998)

6. Gambotto v WCP Ltd (1995)

7. Northside Developments Pty Ltd v Registrar-General (1990)

8. Permanent Trustee Aus. Ltd (as Trustee of Advance Property Fund) v Stout & Others (1999)

9. Nassar v Innovative Precasters Group Pty Ltd (2009)

10. McGellin v Mount King Mining NL (1998)

11. Beck v Weinstock (2013)

12. Kinsela v Russell Kinsela Pty Ltd (in liq) (1986)

13. ASIC v Hellicar (2012)

14. ASIC v Lindberg (2012)

15. Shafron v ASIC (2012)

16. ASIC v Healey (2011)

17. Vines v ASIC (2006)

18. ASIC v Adler (2002)

19. Brunninghausen v Glavanics (1999)

20. ASIC v Rich (2003)

Verified Expert

This is a 1000 words assignment which talks about The Centro matter: ASIC v Healey [2011] FCA 717 and breach of director's duties. The matter of Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healey [2011] FCA 717 was a hearing in relation to the Centro group in the Federal Court of Australia before Middleton J. It concerned the scope of a director's duty to exercise reasonable care and skill in the context of understanding the financial reports of a company. The work was written in Microsoft word and follows APA style of referencing.

Reference no: EM131216243

Questions Cloud

How will you present your impressions of the client : Discuss the pertinent multicultural perspectives you considered. Explain how you would prepare yourself to defend your evaluation in the court setting or to relevant third parties. Be sure to support your explanation with professional literature.

What is the debt-equity ratio before any choices are made : A company having total assets of S2,350,000 and liabilities of $950,000 needed to raise 1,000000 to purchase some land for expansion. They could either borrow tihe funds using 20 year bonds or they could issue 100,000 shares of common stock at the es..

Derive the transfer function h (z) of the lti-dt system : Derive the transfer function H (z) of the LTI-DT system described by the circuit given in Figure 2.9. Obtain the difference equation relating the input x(n) to the output y(n).

Find the total apparent power : If a watt hour meter draws 1.5 W and 11.3 vars from a potential transformer, and 1.2 W and 1.8 vars from a current transformer, the total apparent power burden placed on the current transformer is

Research your selected case on austlii : HI6027: BUSINESS AND CORPORATIONS LAW - Advise your lecturer by email of your group members and case selected. PLEASE NOTE: Lecturer approval is required. You must NOT start on your assignment until your lecturer approves your group and case.

Accounting-segment margin and management compensation : Gantry Manufacturing is a medium-sized organization with manufacturing facilities in seven different locations around the southwestern United States. What are the implications of having the corporate office issue memos requiring the facilities to rec..

Forensic accountant demonstrate professional care : Assume a land development company hired an engineer and architecture firm to conduct a feasibility study on a potential land purchase. The report indicated that the land was suitable for development. How would a forensic accountant demonstrate profes..

Indicate whether the cost will be capitalized or expensed : For each of the transactions that follow, indicate whether the cost will be capitalized or expensed by Action Corporation. Action paid $50,000 in salaries for research and development on a process in hopes to patent in another year. Action paid $10,0..

Reviews

inf1216243

9/30/2016 9:15:03 AM

You made an incredible paper with regards to with discovering references for my paper (I was experiencing serious difficulties this) and thank you for utilizing the references I sent to you - I really, really welcome all your diligent work. You are an exceptional expert and I thank you for your services. I will utilize ExpertsMind.com when I am in urgent requirement for help on my research projects once more.

9/30/2016 9:13:55 AM

Before making payment I would like to give you specific instruction about this assignment. You need to write about the case # 16. "ASIC V Healey (2011)" under the Corporation Law Cases. Please see the key requirement below 1. Read and understand the case "ASIC V Healey (2011)" 2. Research my selected case on Austlii. 3. Select the party you wish to write either ASIC or HEALEY 4. Prepare and present a summary of the case and your selected party's arguments. 5. Also please write about issue, rules, outcomes of similar other case and decision of the court. Looking forward to hearing from you

Write a Review

Required(*) Message

User Account

All Pages

Research your selected case on austlii

Reference no: EM131216243 , Length:

Reference no: EM131216243

Questions Cloud

Reviews

inf1216243

inf1216243

Write a Review

Business Law and Ethics Questions & Answers

Legal environment of business caselet

Business ethics & legal issues caselet

Questions on business law and ethics

Discuss the doctrine of ratification of pre-incorporation

Discuss the extent of phoenixing activity

Application of law to facts

Question on business law and ethics

Questions on business law

Iidentify the issue raised by the facts

Evaluation of software development

Business value and ethics

Explain what is meant by income by ordinary concepts

Assured A++ Grade

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT