Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Question: Andrew and Susan married in 2007 and lived together until they separated in December 2013. After 12 months of living apart, they came to an agreement in relation to the maintenance of mortgage and transfer of their matrimonial home located in Sydney held in joint names. The agreement between them was that Susan would pay Andrew $150,000 for his part of ownership interest in the property and that Andrew would pay Susan $1000 per month as an allowance for the monthly instalment of repayment of loan on the property. Their agreement also included that 'when Susan would pay off all charges (loan) in connection with their home until the loan repayments had been completed, Andrew would transfer the house into Susan's sole name.'
The agreement was written and signed by both of them. Accordingly, Susan has paid off the outstanding balance on the home loan including all other charges on 5 December 2022 and asks Andrew to transfer the title (ownership) to her sole name, but he refuses to do so. Instead, Andrew argues that their agreement is not enforceable because it is a family agreement. Can Susan seek enforcement of the agreement against Andrew? Y Explain the first three essential elements of a valid contract in connection with the facts provided and advise Susan whether she has a good chance of winning against Andrew in a suit for breach of contract.
You refer to the relevant case law and legislation where necessary to support your advice. please answer the question in ILAC format thank you.
What is the case's bottom-line legal takeaway? Why does the case matter, and what general principle, if any, does it stand for
What claims could Dr. Stuart assert against the other physicians, and what defenses could the other physicians raise? Discuss the elements of each potential claim and defense, as well as your evaluation of the likelihood of success on each claim o..
Alaska Pacific University - What do you think about the Gamestop phenomena? Do you agree that reddit posters are engaging in free speech or market manipulation
Carlos, a citizen of California, is injured in an automobile accident in Arizona. Alex, the driver of the other vehicle is from New Mexico. If Carlos were to sue Alex, would this case be heard in federal or state court? What factors would determin..
Would to interview you to discuss the nature and growth of high-tech crime also known as cybercrime, computer crime, Internet crime, and high-tech crime.
A PowerPoint slide presentation discussing an ethical case from the assigned readings. The presentation will be on an approved case from the Burnor & Raley text.
Based on what you have learned in this course, how would you describe your approach to business ethics (I.e., what are your principles? What is your guide?)?
Three hundred workers at the Mott's apple juice plant (a Dr Pepper Snapple subsidiary) in Williamson, New York, waged a 16-week strike when the company.
In addition to complying with equal employment opportunity laws, many companies make special efforts to recruit employees.
This essay will be designed to test the student's research skills and deal with a practical real life scenario in a corporate law context.
Are moral turpitude clauses enforceable for off duty conduct of security guards? Any legal evidence here?
Critical Legal Thinking. What general principle underlies the common law doctrine that business owners have a duty of care toward their customers?
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd