Reference no: EM133635448

There is an emphasis in American culture on developing a strong sense of autonomy and independence as we grow older. Although Erikson was keenly aware that there is a constant tension between independence and belonging, a theme running throughout his developmental theory is that in order to advance to higher stages of development we must achieve a stronger sense of independence, increasingly liberating ourselves from our dependence upon others. Is our focus in America on autonomy and independence an unmitigated good or are there other possibilities?

Looking at moral reasoning in America, Carol Gilligan contends that the emphasis on autonomy and independence is based on a masculine ideal, whereas a focus on social relationships, empathy, and interconnectedness lies at the heart of the feminist perspective.

1) In your initial discussion post, please describe Gilligan's case for gender bias in Kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning. How does she justify her argument?

2) How does her theory of moral reasoning relate to Erikson's ideas about the relationship between autonomy and intimacy?

3) Finally, in your own upbringing, were interdependence/empathy or independence/autonomy emphasized more? At what ages (be specific with at least one example)? Did the focus change as you grew older? Was it different in your family depending on your gender? What perspective would you try to emphasize with your own (perhaps hypothetical) children? Would it be different for different genders? This last set of questions is asking for your opinion about these issues in moral reasoning and there is not a correct answer, but you should engage the course readings in your responses.