My Average in the marking was a 79. I got some answers concerning this mentoring administration toward the finish of the second marking. My normal was a 86. My present average for the third marking period is a 93. I have significantly enhanced my review thankx to this mentoring administration! Much obliged to YOU SOO MUCH

Literature Review Both issues were defined, concepts and key models were clearly identified. Both issues were defined, concepts and key models were identified. Both issues were defined, however, concepts and key models were hard to identify. Identification and issues arising from diagnosis and reflection Identification and issues arising from diagnosis and reflection Theoretical and behavioural skills were clearly identified. Theoretical and behavioural skills were identified but lacking depth. Theoretical and behavioural skills were not clearly identified. Action plan for next 6 months Detailed 6 month action plan with timeline and success measure included. 6 month action plan lacking details with either timeline or some success measure included. 6 month action plan lacking details with either timeline or success measure not included.

Diagnosis and Reflection. All results discussed were relevant to the student and in-depth analysis occurred at a very high standard. All results discussed were relevant to the student and analysis occurred at a high standard. Most results discussed were relevant to the student and some in-depth analysis occurred at satisfactory standard. Discussion of results of relevant diagnostic tools showing an understanding of the results and being able to apply each to their personal situation 2 recent professional interactions identified and analysed based on key areas requiring development which support the need for further personal communication development 2 recent professional interactions were identified and analysed in-depth based of key areas requiring development 2 recent professional interactions were identified but not analysed in-depth based of key areas requiring development 1 recent professional interaction was identified and analysed in- depth based of key areas requiring development

Key Criteria Exceeds Expectations Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 75 - 84% Meets Expectations Meets Expectations Below Expectations (High Distinction) 85- 100% (Credit) 65 – 74% (Pass) 50 – 64% (Fail) below 50% Introduction (attention-getting statement, thesis, main points to be covered, diagnostic tools to be used and applied, transition to the body of the presentation) Superior articulation of the six elements of an introduction. Above average articulation of the five elements of an introduction. Clearly articulated less than four of the elements of an introduction. Poor articulation of less than three of the elements of an introduction. Introduction contained less than two of the elements of an introduction.

Students should note this is the minimum standard for demonstration of research. Students who only meet the minimum will only receive the minimum grade for this component. There is a late deduction of 2 points per day after the due date. The essay must include a cover page that contains your name, student number, resident campus, assessment title, and lecturer. The essay must conform to the APA style guide. This is a summative assessment so marks will not be released until after Certification of Grades.

must read all attached files and must see highlighted sentences. after read description make assignment without grammar error. This assessment accounts for 40% of your final grade. The assessment is due in Week 12 on Friday 6th 5.00 pm. The essay must be 2500 words in length. Two points will be deducted for those essays that are over or under by 200 words. The essay must include a minimum of 12 academic references, one of which may by the assigned textbook for this course.