Reference no: EM133594465
Assignment:
Analytical short response paper that engages the readings, of your choice. you need to put the works into conversation with one another.
Identify the overarching purpose of the text, describing their perspective on the given topic, and offering your analysis. You must engage at least three written texts in your paper.
Areas of Consideration:
What central questions or issues are the scholars focusing on within the texts? You must clearly and substantively identify the primary arguments for each of the texts in your paper. You are expected to provide at least two to three sentences to support your claim. For instance, if you were to analyze the article by Collins, you would identify her primary argument as addressing race, gender, and class as new categories of analysis that provide context for our varying positionalities.
After addressing the first point, you can move on to one or more the following questions. You do not need to answer all these question in your paper, these are designed to help you structure your thought process. If relevant, you are welcome to use any upcoming readings in this paper.
- What aspects of the reading did you find particularly valuable, useful, or convincing, or compelling? In each instance, carefully explain why.
- How would you offer a productive critique of this person's work? After first explaining what is useful about the text or what it accomplishes, what gaps did you find?
- What are the similarities between the readings you chose? How do they differ? In other words, how do you think Author A may respond to Author B?
The readings are: Intersectionality: an everyday metaphor anyone can use by Krimberle Crenshaw, interviewed by Bim Adevunmi
The second reading is: Anti-Asian Violence and Abolition Feminism as Asian American
Feminist Praxis by Bao Lo
The third reading is: Location matters: the 2017 women's marches as intersectional imaginary by Zakiya Luna'.