Reference no: EM133812604

Question

Jeff Groh, a special agent for the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, applied for a search warrant to search the Ramirez ranch for illegal weapons. On the warrant, Groh mistakenly omitted the exact items the agency was requesting permission to search for, but he did correctly listed the items on the application itself. A federal magistrate approved and issued the warrant. The Ramirez argued that the incorrectly completed warrant violated the Fourth Amendment's requirement of a particular description of any items for which the agents sought to search. All of the following reflect decisions made by the Supreme Court in this case, except? See materials for Groh v. Ramirez (2004) Group of answer choices a search warrant that does not describe the items sought on the warrant, but does list them on the application is nevertheless incomplete and violates the 4th Amendment's particularity requirements a search warrant that does not describe the items for which the agents will search violates the partcicularity requireents, but the warrant was rehabilitated because it was approved & signed by a federal magistrate execution of a search warrant that violates the 4th Amendment particularity requirements strips qualified immunity from the officers/agents who executed the defective search warrant All of these answers are correct findings in this case as determined by the Supreme Court.