Reference no: EM133293294

Question 1. Assuming that the store and district managers of Ralphs received complaints about Misiolek's behavior starting in 1985, but that these complaints did not reach Ralphs' headquarters in Compton, do you believe that the judge is right in holding that the company as a whole should not be held responsible for his actions? Should the company be held responsible for policies that prevent complaints from reaching headquarters?

Question 2. What kind of penalty do you believe would be appropriate for Ralphs? In your view, was the initial $33.3 million penalty excessive? Explain. Was the final 2006 judgment fair? Explain.

Question 3. Should Kroger have to pay for events that happened before it took over the chain of supermarkets?

Question 4. What can a company do to make sure that a situation like Misiolek's does not occur? Why do you think Ralphs allowed Misiolek to continue managing stores?