Reference no: EM13350434

Question 3
Presume that in April of 2005, Sally Gant who is African-American was looking for rental housing for herself and her son. Gant saw a phone number in a studio house about an available unit. She termed the number from her workplace. The phone number was for a business possessed by Mark Armstrong. Armstrong is as well the sole owner of the apartment building where Gant sought to rent one of the units. According to Gant a secretary put her review through to Armstrong so that Armstrong could discuss the terms of the rental with her. Gant testified that she inquired Armstrong about the availability of the apartment as well as the number of bedrooms in the apartment.

According to Gant, in the place of answering her substantive questions about the unit, Armstrong asked her a series of offensive as well as discriminatory questions about whether she was American and whether she was Caucasian. Gant was offended as well as told Armstrong that she could not ask those types of questions. Gant didn't tell Armstrong that she was in fact black. Armstrong replied by saying: I container rent to whoever I want to. Afterward Armstrong slammed down the telephone receiver ending the call as well as further discussions about the terms of rental.

Gant's telephone call to complainant was witnessed by a co-worker. According to the co-worker, Gant befitted upset during the conversation as well as told Armstrong that he was treading on thin ice. The co-worker specified that she overheard Gant telling Armstrong that he wasn't permitted to ask those types of questions.

Armstrong states that he didn't recall ever speaking to Gant about an apartment as well as he did not discriminate against African-Americans or any other group. His defence is that Gant should have spoken with someone else when she telephoned Armstrong's place of business. Nevertheless Armstrong likewise testified that none of his employees were authorized to discuss rental terms with prospective tenants.

What laws have been disrupt here if any? What are Gant's damages? Are there any additional facts that we require to find out in order to resolve this dispute?