Reference no: EM133424251

Case Study: Paula was involved in a house fire and was admitted to the local hospital, as she had suffered severe injuries. She informed the hospital staff that she was covered by homeowner's insurance from Maulstate Insurance, and #hat Maulstate would pay for the medical bills. When the Maulstate insurance agent arrives, he informs Paula that the insurance will cover every cost and that all she has to do is sign some papers for Maulstate to start the procedures. The papers that Paula signs are actually an agreement that Maulstate will pay only 25 percent of the medical bills since the company believe Paula may have set the fire by leaving the kitchen when cooking with oil. The fire department has already ruled the fire was an accident started by electrical wire failure. The agent is aware that Maulstate will only pay 25 percent, but does not tell that to Paula. When Paula receives a bill from the hospital showing that Maulstate only paid $25,000 of the $100,000 bill and she owes $75,000, she is shocked. She goes to see Vinny the lawyer Question 3. Vinny tells Paula that Maulstate made a false representation of material fact. Vinny tells her that making a false representation alone will not win a case, but there are four other things she would need to prove to win.

Question: Name three of those four other elements of a case involving a false representation of a material fact, and provide evidence from the question above that Paula can use to prove those points