Reference no: EM131086184
LITERATURE REVIEW FOR THE INTERVENTION PROPOSAL
In Week One, you created an annotated bibliography. It is now time to take that research and begin working on your Intervention Proposal. One of the main components of an intervention proposal is the literature review. This week you will be drafting a portion of the literature review that you will include in your Week Six Intervention Proposal. For this week, choose three to four articles that include in a mini literature review that you will build on during Week Six to complete your Intervention Proposal. These articles should all be recent (published within the past 10 years). You should also cite other material (e.g., seminal works about the theories) as appropriate.
In your literature review:
State your thesis statement that is your professional opinion. Briefly explain the organization of the paper. For example, if there is a major controversy in this literature, briefly describe the controversy and state that you will present research supporting first one side, and then the other. Or, if three methodologies have been used to address the question, briefly describe them and then state that you will compare the results obtained by the three methods. Begin by broadly discussing the literature. Then, narrow your review to the studies that are most related to your research question. Your literature review should resemble a funnel - wide (broad) at the top and narrow (focused) at the bottom.
Ensure that at least one article (but no more than two) supports the opposing side to your thesis. Describe studies in enough detail that the reader has a general sense of the study's hypothesis, methods, and findings. Evaluate the studies. Do not provide article summaries; rather, provide descriptive and scholarly evaluations of the research. Discuss implications of studies (i.e., your judgment of what the studies show and where to go from here). It is common (and often better) to combine the description and evaluation sections. If you do combine them, do not forget to evaluate them. State your conclusion that reaffirms your professional opinion.
The literature review must be four to six pages, excluding title and reference pages, and it must be formatted according to APA style as outlined .
|
Solely for corporate purposes
: Wally corp borrows 400k from bank. Wally corp executes a negotiable promissory note to evidence the loan. Bank insists that two corp. officers also be personally liable on the debt. So ally, the ceo, signs his name on the back of the note, and Cha..
|
|
Discuss one point you likeand one point you dislike of peer
: Discuss one point you like/agree with, and one point you dislike/disagree with and explain why. Length of positing consists of approximately 100 words (minimum).
|
|
How you may use this logical process to solve problems
: Review the description of the Scientific Method in your required Readings this week. Think about how you may use this logical process to solve problems in your daily life.
|
|
Explain why this assumption was necessary
: Explain why this assumption was necessary, and give a way to make the weights unique if they are not so.
|
|
Provide descriptive and scholarly evaluations of research
: Ensure that at least one article (but no more than two) supports the opposing side to your thesis. Describe studies in enough detail that the reader has a general sense of the study's hypothesis, methods, and findings. Evaluate the studies. Do not..
|
|
What was the artist intentions in the art
: What was the artist intentions, use your previous findings and research as evidence; JUDGEMENT is the artwork successful, why and why not? what works in the piece? What should be changed, added, or eliminated?
|
|
Concepts of roles and norms figure
: How do the concepts of roles and norms figure into this case? Explain.
|
|
Why is it important for a company to focus on its liquidity
: Why is it important for a company to focus on its liquidity? What special challenges do entrepreneurial firms have in regard to remaining liquid?
|
|
Prospects of success against competitor
: Create a minimum two-page APA formatted paper evaluating McDonald's strategy. Choose at least one of McDonald's competitors and discuss its position relative to McDonald's. Comment on McDonald's prospects of success against this competitor
|