Frst slide make same as task 2 like managing waiting time in restaurant Don’t write executive summary,introduction and purpose, start with background. Write research objectives same as task two. Use management problem and research question two 2 and just extent it. In every slide there should be 5 points.literature review should be based on task 2 literature review,it should not be plagiarized but similar.assignment must have the same ppt headings which given in above chocolate ppt slides.in above ppt data analysis has 20 slides but u can make 16.graph should be explained use above pattern and task 2 data. 20-25% plagiarism acceptable of task 2 and task 3 Thanks for providing me the solution according to the requirement given by me, these assignment are interlinked and and really hard to be done.. These guys really did well and accurate..

MGT726 task 3 will be based on task 1 and task 2 regarding Chaskah restaurant Plz take task 1 and task 2 for this task 3.choose topic restaurant. There are so many problems but we have to define only one problem like on weekends our restaurant is too busy and customers can’t take their order at the proper time. So we cannot make our customers satisfied with our service. So there there should be a research question .Plz choose the appropriate question here. There are four objectives plz start the objectives with- to explore To identify To determine Total 500 words only Task 1 - Marking Sheet.docx Task 1 - Proposal Template.docxUse task 2 for task 3 Plagiarism acceptable upto 40%only With task 2 I need only ppt slides Not word documentRestaurant name Chaskah Management problem and research questions same with task2 What are the best practices..............this line u can write in ur own words... But last 4points must be same

Happy with the assistance provided. Special thanks to Sagar for his support through out my assignment he is very quick on mail and promptly responded on my every mail. As I had urgent task to be delivered, he was keeping a constant eye on the order and ensured it is delivered in time. Thanks Sagar !!! Great Work !!!

Identification and concise justification of the methodology taking on board feedback from Task 2. (10%) Concisely articulated and justified a highly appropriate methodology for addressing the management problem. Took on board all the feedback from Task 2. Concisely and clearly justified an appropriate methodology for addressing the management problem. Took on board most the feedback from Task 2. Clearly discussed the method used to address the management problem. Took on board some of the feedback from Task 2. Explained the method used to address the management problem. Some lack of clarity. Took on board limited feedback from Task 2 Did not discuss the methods used to address the management problem or presented very limited coverage of methods used. Did not take on board feedback from Task 2. Mark: ( /10) Comment:

Mark ( /5) Comment: Summary of the literature review including a concise synthesis of previous research and relevant secondary data search leading to the research gap taking on board feedback from Task 2. (10%) Presented a concise, critical and well synthesized review of highly relevant literature and secondary sources, culminating in an insightful evaluation of the research gap leading to the research question. Took on board all the feedback from Task 2. Presented a concise, critical and synthesized review of relevant literature and secondary sources, culminating in a discussion of the research gap leading to the research question. Took on board most the feedback from Task 2. Presented a brief review of the relevant literature and attempted to integrate relevant sources of theory and secondary sources to identify the research gap leading to the research question. Took on board some of the feedback from Task 2. Presented an adequate summary of the literature, but could have been more critical and better integrated. Explained the research gap leading to the research question. Took on board limited feedback from Task 2

Criteria HD DN CR P F Presentation of a concise background to the research and statement of the managerial problem, research question and research objectives taking on board feedback from Task 2. (5%) Provided a concise and succinct background to the research. Cleary articulated a pertinent management problem. Clearly articulated a highly appropriate research question and well-developed research objectives. Took on board all the feedback from Task 2. Provided a concise background to the research. Cleary articulated a relevant management problem. Clearly articulated appropriate research question and well-developed research objectives. Took on board most the feedback from Task 2. Provided a solid background to the research. Stated a useful management problem. Stated well-formulated research question and research objectives. Took on board some of the feedback from Task 2.