Reference no: EM131370132
Instructions
The exercise must be at least 500 words in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Be sure to include a title page and, if you include references, a bibliography. The exercise should be in outline (not essay) format, with each part labeled and numbered as specified below.
Part One: Formulate the Question
Read through the list of available topic areas, and select a topic on which you would like to write your next two papers. Formulate a specific, concrete, ethical question pertaining to that topic, and place that at the top of your paper.
The question should be specific enough to discuss in six to eight pages (which is the length of the Final Paper assignment). For example, if you were interested in discussing the topic of capital punishment, a question like "Is capital punishment wrong?" would be too vague, and would need to be reformulated as a more specific question, such as "Should we execute people convicted of first degree murder?" or "Is it just to use capital punishment when there is the possibility of executing innocent persons?" or "Is the capital punishment system racist?"
Part Two: Provide a Brief Introduction to the Topic
Your introduction should focus on setting out the topic and scope of the discussion in a way that clearly establishes what exactly you will be talking about and why it is significant. It should also provide any necessary context such as the background, current state of affairs, definitions of key terms, and so on. You want to try to do this in a way that stays as neutral as possible, avoids controversial assumptions, rhetorical questions, and the like. In other words, you should try to construct an introduction to the topic that could be an introduction to a paper defending any position on the question at issue.
It is important for your introduction to narrow down the topic as much as possible. Doing so will allow you to provide a more detailed consideration of the issues and explain the reasoning more clearly in later papers. In general, arguments and analyses are much stronger when they focus on addressing a particular issue thoroughly and in detail, and doing so often requires deciding on one particular question or point to discuss, and leaving other possible ones aside.
You should label this section of your paper as "Introduction."
Part Three: Provide a Position Statement
State clearly and precisely the position you intend to defend on the question you have formulated. This does not need to be more than one sentence.
Note that providing a position statement does not necessarily presume that you are confident in your position, that other positions do not have merit, or that you cannot change your mind later. However, for now, it is important to at least tentatively take a stand on a position you believe to be better supported than others.
Label this section as "Position Statement."
Part Four: Identify and Explain a Supporting Reason
Identify and explain a plausible reason someone could give that supports the position you have taken and be sure to clearly explain why you think it supports that position. The explanation should aim to be three to five sentences (shorter explanations are possible, but will likely be inadequate; longer explanations are likely to be too verbose).
Label this section as "Supporting Reason."
Part Five: Identify and Explain an Opposing Reason
Identify and explain a plausible reason someone might give that would oppose or challenge the position you have taken and be sure to clearly explain why you think it would oppose or challenge it. The explanation should aim to be three to five sentences (shorter explanations are possible, but will likely be inadequate; longer explanations are likely to be too verbose). You should strive to articulate that reason in a way that someone defending a contrary position to your own would do. This requires stepping back from your own position and being able to think about the problem as objectively as you can. You should not attempt to respond to this opposing reason.
Describe three major characteristics of your audience
: Describe three major characteristics of your audience (official position, decision-making power, current view on topic, other important characteristic).
|
How a nonprofit organizations strategic plan affects design
: Post your perspective on how a nonprofit organization's strategic plan affects the design of its rewards system. Explain whether there is a direct connection between the mission and values of the organization and its compensation system.
|
Can the sparse matrix technique be used in the qr method
: How can we apply sparse matrix techniques to critical eigenvalue calculations for large-scale electrical power systems? Can the sparse matrix technique be used in the QR method?
|
Post an explanation of strategies that you actively involved
: Post an explanation of at least two strategies that you, as a human services professional actively involved in contemporary issues, may use to plan for your own self-care.
|
Provide a position statement
: Identify and explain a plausible reason someone could give that supports the position you have taken and be sure to clearly explain why you think it supports that position.
|
What are major manifestations of low-frequency oscillation
: Why is the oscillating frequency among local generators lower than that among generators in a plant, and the oscillating frequency among regional generators is lower than that among local generators?
|
Design a information systems security plan for organization
: Write a 2,450- to 3,500-word paper in which you design a physical, personal, and information systems security plan for your organization (GOOGLE) from the Risk and Threat Assessment assignment.
|
What is the critical eigenvalue
: What is the critical eigenvalue? What methods are there for calculating critical eigenvalues of large-scale electrical power systems? What advantages and disadvantages are there for each method?
|
Implement a particular product
: You will be building up a formal, researched justification report (one part at a time) that culminates in a recommendation to implement a particular product, service, or program in your place of employment.
|