Reference no: EM133665881

Provide a constructive response to the following Esaay based on its concept and rate it 1-10. Hello from Indonesia! One compelling reason for someone from Indonesia to be fascinated by these ancient cultures is their profound impact on the development of Western philosophy, governance, and the arts. Studying Greek and Roman civilizations can offer valuable insights into the foundations of democracy, law, and management, which have played pivotal roles in shaping many societies, including Indonesia. Now, let's delve into the structures of Athenian democracy and compare them with the system of government in our country: Citizenship and Franchise: In Athens, citizenship was limited to adult male citizens born to Athenian parents (History.com Editors, 2018). Women, enslaved people, and foreign residents were excluded from citizenship. The right to participate in the political process was thus restricted. Compare this to Indonesia, where the modern democratic system aims for broader citizenship, allowing both men and women to participate in the political process, emphasizing universal suffrage. Procedure to Make Laws and Power Distribution: Athenian democracy relied on a direct form of participation where citizens gathered in the Assembly to make decisions collectively (History.com Editors, 2018). Elected officials, such as magistrates and the Council of 500, played roles in governance. In contrast, Indonesia employs a representative democracy where citizens elect representatives to make decisions. The legislative process involves elected officials, parliamentary discussions, and public input. Power of the Judiciary: In Athens, the judicial system was part of the democratic structure, with citizens serving as jurors in trials. However, the legal system was not entirely separate from the political system (History.com Editors, 2018). In Indonesia, the judiciary is intended to be independent of political influence, ensuring a fair and impartial legal process. Judicial Review: Ancient Athens did not have a formal system of judicial review as we understand it today (History.com Editors, 2018). The Assembly and Council had significant power in interpreting and enforcing laws. In many modern democracies, including Indonesia, there is a system of judicial review where courts can assess the constitutionality of laws and government actions. Constraining Power of Public Officials: Athenian democracy had mechanisms such as ostracism, where citizens could vote to banish a prominent figure deemed a threat to the state (History.com Editors, 2018). However, these were more populist measures than institutional checks and balances. In contemporary Indonesia, checks and balances are implemented through a separation of powers between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches and various oversight institutions. Studying the Athenian democratic system provides a historical perspective on governance structures. It can offer insights into how various principles have evolved, contributing to our diverse systems.