U5.2 U6.7 Documentation of Sources & Reference List (Section: discussion/concl usion, reference list; excludes introduction) All sources are correctly documented in-text with a wide variety of structures used. Reference list is accurate and error free. Most sources are correctly referenced in-text, with the use of simple reporting structures. Reference list is mostly accurate with non-critical errors Some or all sources are not documented, raising a strong possibility of plagiarism. Reference list contains critical errors. A critical error prevents the reader from easily locating the original source. 10 marks 6 marks 4 marks Maximum 100 marks 65 marks 45 marks

U1.4 U4.1 U4.2 U4.3 U4.4 U5.2 C1.2 C1.7 C2.1 C2.3 C2.4 Evidence of credible sources (Section: discussion/ conclusion) Information derived to sustain paper’s introduction comes from a rich variety of quality electronic sources. Paper demonstrates recognition of bias and value in these sources. Ten (10) sources, including four (4) academic, are referenced in-text and in the List of References. Printed evidence of all sources is provided with cited sections highlighted. Paper displays effort in selecting quality sources. Six (6) sources, including two (2) academic, are referenced in- text and in the List of References. Printed evidence of six (6) + sources is provided with cited sections highlighted. Sources are not compelling in either variety or quality. No recognition of inherent bias or value is shown. Or, no printed evidence of sources with cited sections highlighted. 10 marks 6 marks 4 marks

PC Relevant part of the activity relating to the criteria. Above Satisfactory Satisfactory Not Yet Satisfactory U1.5 Writing style/ Mechanics/ Vocabulary (Section: Entire submission excluding Introduction) Language is appropriately formal for an academic text. No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. Uses a wide range of vocabulary with sophisticated control of lexical features. Language is generally formal and academic. Grammatical, spelling and/or punctuation errors are evident but only occasionally interfere with communication. Uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task and attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy. Language is not appropriately formal/academic. Many grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors, which affect communication. Limited control of word formation. 20 marks 13 marks 9 marks

C3.1 C3.2 C3.3 C3.4 Analysis of results (Section: Appendices, Interpretation of results, discussion) Sophisticated analysis of overall statistics + two other attributes (e.g. analysis/comparison of responses due to age and comparison/analysis of results due to education level). Analysis of overall statistics (all attributes combined) - done to a satisfactory standard. Poor analysis of overall statistics (all attributes combined) – not to a satisfactory standard. 20 marks 14 marks 10 marks

C2.2 C1.5 Questionnaire (Section: Appendices) Well-presented with clear, well- targeted questions. Excellent variety and depth. All results logically and accurately collated and reported. Well-presented. Most questions are clear and relevant. Most results are reported accurately. Many questions are unclear /irrelevant and/or most results are reported inaccurately. 10 marks 6 marks 4 marks

U1.4 C4.3 Content/Source Integration (Section: Entire submission excluding Introduction) The report smoothly integrates the writer’s ideas, quotations and paraphrasing. Correct and creative use of reporting verbs. Careful and consistent analysis of sources throughout. Thoughtful insights with recommendations made. The report demonstrates the writer’s own ideas in response to the research. Quotes and paraphrases are integrated with the writer’s own voice. Some analysis of source content. Reporting verbs are sometimes used successfully. Insights and recommendations are evident. The report leans heavily toward stringing together quoted material without thoughtfully responding to it or carefully shaping it. Reporting verbs have not been used successfully. Little if any, analysis of content. Limited if any, insight or recommendations. 20 marks 14 marks 10 marks

U1.5 C4.1 Organisation (Section: Entire submission excluding Introduction) Report is organised logically and clearly. Sections and paragraphs contain all structural elements and many cohesive devices. Report is organised in a logical and mostly clear manner. Sections and paragraphs contain most of the necessary structural elements. Submission contains some relevant cohesive devices. Report lacks logical order and clarity in organisation. Sections and paragraphs require further structural elements and cohesive devices. 5 marks 3 marks 2 marks

PC Relevant part of the activity relating to the criteria. Above Satisfactory Satisfactory Not Yet Satisfactory U1.5 U5.3 U5.4 C1.1 C1.3 C1.4 C1.5 C1.6 C2.5 C2.7 C3.4 C4.1 C4.2 C4.4 Planning/ Drafting/ Formatting/ (Section: Entire submission excluding Introduction) Final submission adheres to subject formatting requirements. Report contains all required sections and appendices thoroughly planned and clearly presented. Final submission mostly adheres to subject formatting requirements. Report contains all required sections although planning and presentation are inconsistent at times. Final submission does not adhere to subject formatting requirements. Report does not contain all required sections and / or planning and presentation are often inconsistent. 5 marks 3 marks 2 marks