Reference no: EM133567117

Homework

Overview

The project for this course is the creation of a presentation on a controversial court case. The final project represents an authentic demonstration of competency because the ability to communicate effectively with others in the criminal justice field and related fields will be important to your success as a criminal justice professional. This presentation should showcase your ability to communicate clearly and effectively. The project is divided into two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submission. These milestones will be submitted in Modules. The final project will be submitted in Module Nine.

In this homework, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:

A. Construct clear and accurate criminal justice timelines from the alleged commission of a crime through the sentencing and appeals phases.

B. Compare and contrast criminal procedure with civil procedure in addressing issues in local, state, or federal courts.

C. Assess the equality of the judicial process in controversial court cases for determining how the process could have been administered more impartially.

D. Defend, with evidence, positions on controversial topics in the trial-court and post-verdict phases, using clear and effective communication.

E. Evaluate roles of criminal justice professionals for their relevance to courts and the judicial process

Prompt

Choose a controversial court case in which the judicial process created civil unrest and discord or was otherwise the subject of national media scrutiny, and that aligns with your educational and professional interests in criminal justice. First, discuss the facts, the legal issues, the judicial proceedings, the procedural history, and the holding(s) of the court case. Next, identify and analyze the underlying cause(s) of the controversy related to the court case. Then explore whether the courts could have taken any alternative courses of direction that would have remedied the situation more appropriately and effectively. Finally, conclude with your perspective on what this court case illustrates about the role of criminal justice professionals in the criminal justice system, along with the workings of courts and the judicial process more generally.

Remember that you are developing this presentation for your supervisor; your goal should be to demonstrate superior analysis and communication skills. As this is a self-sustaining presentation, you will need to include speaker notes or a transcript. Although not a requirement, producing an audio recording or a video recording with audio is highly recommended, as oral and visual presentation are key communication skills for criminal justice professionals.

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

A. Introduction

1. Overview of Case: Provide a brief overview of your selected controversial court case in which the judicial process created civil unrest and discord or was otherwise the subject of national media scrutiny. In other words, describe the case as a whole, providing a broad sense of the context of the case.

2. Selection of Case: Explain how this case is relevant to you, as a criminal justice professional. In other words, why did you select this particular court case? What makes this case interesting to you professionally?

B. Background of the Case

1. Facts: Provide a clear, succinct, and accurate summary of the key facts of the case. For instance, on what date(s) did the crime occur? Who was involved? What weapon was used (if there was one)?

2. Timeline: Develop a clear, accurate timeline of your controversial court case that summarizes the decision of the court. Specifically, the timeline of your case should include:

a. The legal issues
b. The judicial proceedings
c. The procedural history
d. The holding(s)

3. Verdict: Defend, with evidence, your position on the court's verdict. In other words, did the court issue the most appropriate verdict in the case? Why or why not? Ensure that you communicate your defense clearly and effectively.

4. Type of Court: Explain where (local, state, or federal court) the case was tried, specifically including whether the case was tried in civil court as well as criminal court. Why was the case tried in civil court, or why was it not?

5. Similarities: Explain the similarities between the procedures in the criminal trial that occurred and the procedures in a civil trial (whether actual or potential) for your case.

6. Differences: Explain the differences between the procedures in the criminal trial that occurred and the procedures in a civil trial (whether actual or potential) for your case.

C. Causes of Controversy

1. Media Coverage: Assess the impact of media coverage of the case on the judicial process. For instance, how did the news media shape public perception of the case? How did this, in turn, affect the court proceedings? Or, how did the selection of photographs and videos used by the media impact public opinion and the judicial process?

2. Fairness: Assess the fairness of the administration of the judicial process in your case. In other words, how fair and equitable was the judicial process? Why did the judicial process cause such a controversy?

D. Reaction to Controversy

1. Reaction Explanation: Explain the reaction by the criminal justice court system, the media, and local, state, or national politicians to the perceived equality of the judicial process, supporting your response with specific examples. For instance, were politicians acting in a way that caused bias? Did local media provide objective coverage of the case? Did national media demonstrate sufficient, in-depth knowledge of the facts?

2. Reaction Defense: Justify, with evidence, the appropriateness and effectiveness of the court system's reaction to the controversy during the trial. Ensure that you communicate your justification clearly and effectively.

3. Alternatives Explanation: How could the court system have responded more appropriately and effectively to the controversy during and after the trial? In other words, what alternative courses of direction could the court system have taken? How could the judicial system have worked in a more fair and ethical way?

4. Alternatives Defense: Defend, with evidence, your conclusions about how the court system could have taken an alternative course of direction that might have remedied the situation more appropriately and effectively. Ensure that you communicate your defense clearly and effectively.

E. Conclusion

1. Professional Role: What does this court case illustrate about the role of criminal justice professionals and the operation of the criminal justice court system?

2. Systemic Reforms: Based on your analysis of the controversial court case, explain whether larger, systemic reforms of the criminal justice system and the criminal justice profession are necessary, and what such reforms may be. What evidence do you have to support your conclusions?