I don’t know why I did not notice this yesterday. I have to submit on 2nd. So you can have the time till the 2nd of this month. So now nothing to hurry just concentrate on quality. Yes is fine to do it Oman Cement Company. I am very happy with the work I got within the time very satisfied with the ppt slides and word report also. it was a very good assignment with the best quality of work I really appreciated the work thank you very much for the hard work.

Quality Plan 10% No/ meaningless quality plan Poor description of quality responsibilities, quality criteria and quality methods Acceptable list of quality responsibilities, quality criteria and quality methods, though lacking any detail Good specification of quality responsibilities, quality criteria and quality methods Quality responsibilities, quality criteria and quality methods completed with details which are logical & consistent Quality responsibilities, quality criteria and quality methods completed to a high standard, with systems described for tracking and updating

Risk Register 15% No/ very limited identification of risks and their management An attempt made at identifying risks, but not at risk management Risks identified, initial analysis conducted Risks identified and analysed, attempt made at planning responses. Risks identified and analysed, detailed responses planned. Risks identified and analysed, detailed responses planned, with proximity of risks.

Budget (costing) 15% Project budget is not presented or not represented as activity on node. Project budget illogical and not calculated appropriately or incorrect. Project budget contains some anomalies; calculations largely correct; Project budget presented in tabular format Project budget is done in Excel, or by hand and shows the cost breakdown values; Project budget largely correct. Project budget is done in Excel, or by hand and shows the costing values; Project budget is good and correct. Project budget is done in Excel, or by hand and shows the activity node values; Project budget is neat, appropriate & correct.

Activity List satisfactory. Lack of minor resources. Largely correct WBS, Activity list, Gantt Chart; MS Project used. Network Diagram done in Excel, or by hand and shows the activity node values; Network diagram largely correct. CP identified. Well considered WBS, Activity List. Gantt Chart correct, resources not shown. Resources identified. Network Diagram done in Excel, or by hand and shows the activity node values; Network Diagram good. CP correct. Good consideration of WBS, Activity List. Gantt Chart correct, readable and well analysed. All resources identified for each activity. Network Diagram done in Excel, or by hand and shows the activity node values; Network Diagram neat and correct; CP clear & correct.

Time Management - WBS, Activity List & Gantt Chart - Network Diagram and Critical Path Analysis 30% WBS, Activity List/Gantt Chart not produced/very inaccurate. Lack of clarity on main Activities. Network Diagram not presented or not represented as activity on node. Significant activities missing on WBS, Activity List & Gantt Chart; MS Project not used; Resources not identified; Network Diagram illogical and critical path (CP) not identified or incorrect. Some questionable logic on WBS, Activity List. Gantt Chart acceptable but contains mistakes. Network Diagram contains some anomalies; CP largely correct; OR Network diagram presented in MS Project format

Project stages and Key deliverables 15% No/ illogical discussion of the project stages using 4Ds Poor discussion of the project stages using 4Ds. Less than two of the 4 Ds discussed unsatisfactorily. Acceptable discussion of the project stages using 4Ds. At least two of the 4Ds are discussed satisfactorily Good discussion of the project stages using 4Ds. All 4Ds are discussed well Very good discussion of the project stages using 4Ds. All of 4Ds are discussed very well along with their deliverables Outstanding discussion of the project stages using 4Ds. All of 4Ds are discussed excellently along with their deliverables

Assessment Criteria Marking Grid – Project plan (60%) Criterion Weight <35% 35%-39% 40% - 49% (D) 50% - 59% (C) 60% - 69% (B) >=70% (A) Project Objectives & Introduction 10% Project Objectives/Intro missing or unclear Project Objectives/Intro vague Project Objectives & Intro satisfactory Intro and Project Objectives clear and appropriate Intro & Project Objectives well expressed and almost SMART Intro & Project Objectives clear, precise and SMART Project team roles 5% No/ illogical PBS/WBS Poor PBS/WBS. Acceptable WBS/PBS, but incomplete. Correct diagrammatic form. Good WBS/PBS, complete, but query on content/logic Complete and correct WBS/PBS. Excellent complete, correct and detailed WBS/PBS.

Format MS Word & MS Project Resources/Support Available Class discussion to clarify Assignment; In-class review Unit resources on BREO; Assessment Criteria See assessment criteria marking grid for assessment-2, overleaf. Details of how feedback will be provided 2Q and feedback given on-line through Turn-It-In and marked assessment criteria marking grid. Referral Assignment Your referral assignment will require you to produce a project plan based on another project (discussed and confirmed by your tutor).