Total 2500 words. Analyzing the impact of business assignment 2500 words. This is an individual assignment where you will research and then produce a written Moral Dilemma Analysis report using the Ethical Decision-Making Framework introduced in topics 3 and 4. You will write an individual Moral Dilemma Analysis report as follows (after background work): A cover page with the assignment title ("Assessment 2 - Moral Dilemma Analysis report"), unit code and name, your name and student ID, and the word count. This cover page is not included in the word count.

A maximum of 2,500 words for the report body, using the Ethical Decision-Making Framework introduced in topics 3 and 4, to analyse the moral dilemma stated above. The report will be a convincing argument on what you conclude as the morality of the dilemma outlined above, not based on your opinion or personal views, but instead based on solid research and evidence/facts using the framework. The report will have a very short introduction, multiple sections/subsections, and conclusion. Note that in-text citations (see next point) are included in the word count. A reference list at least fourteen (14) high quality research sources cited in the report body in the Harvard format style using the "(Author, Year)" approach to in-text citation. This reference list is not included in the word count.

Word limit - See the rubric for word limit penalties. The word count is calculated by selecting the text of assignment (see above), and using MS Word's word count feature and unchecking the "Include textboxes, footnotes and endnotes". Further requirements for the report are as follows: The report cannot include any quotes, images/figures or summarises from other sources. The entire report must be in your own words. In particular, review the following guidelines about paraphrasing (note that ‘summarising' and ‘quoting' is not permitted in this report). You cannot use scanned tables (or images with text) and insert this in your report. All text in the body of the report, even if it is scanned, will be added to your word count. Please see rubric for details of the penalties which apply to exceeding the word count for this report.

Submission Instructions - The final submission for the Moral Dilemma Analysis report must be one (1) single file, named surname_MIS741_T1_year_assign2 (e.g. Liang_MIS741_T1_2_assign2), including: A cover page with the assignment title ("Assessment 2 - Moral Dilemma Analysis report"), unit code and name, your name and student ID, and the word count. The Moral Dilemma Analysis report - Use the submission folder under the Assessments tab, then Assignments in CloudDeakin. You must keep a backup copy of every assignment you submit, until the marked assignment has been returned to you. In the unlikely event that one of your assignments is misplaced, you will need to submit your backup copy.

When you are required to submit an assignment through your CloudDeakin unit site, you will receive an email to your Deakin email address confirming that it has been submitted. You should check that you can see your assignment in the Submissions view of the Assignment dropbox folder after upload, and check for, and keep, the email receipt for the submission.

Notes - Penalties for late submission: The following marking penalties will apply if you submit an assessment task after the due date without an approved extension: 5% will be deducted from available marks for each day up to five days, and work that is submitted more than five days after the due date will not be marked. You will receive 0% for the task. 'Day' means working day for paper submissions and calendar day for electronic submissions. The Unit Chair may refuse to accept a late submission where it is unreasonable or impracticable to assess the task after the due date.

For more information about academic misconduct, special consideration, extensions, and assessment feedback, please refer to the document Your rights and responsibilities as a student in this Unit in the first folder next to the Unit Guide of the Resources area in the CloudDeakin unit site. Building evidence of your experiences, skills and knowledge (Portfolio) - Building a portfolio that evidences your skills, knowledge and experience will provide you with a valuable tool to help you prepare for interviews and to showcase to potential employers. There are a number of tools that you can use to build a portfolio.

You are provided with cloud space through OneDrive, or through the Portfolio tool in the Cloud Unit Site, but you can use any storage repository system that you like. Remember that a Portfolio is YOUR tool. You should be able to store your assessment work, reflections, achievements and artefacts in YOUR Portfolio. Once you have completed this assessment piece, add it to your personal Portfolio to use and showcase your learning later, when applying for jobs, or further studies. Curate your work by adding meaningful tags to your artefacts that describe what the artefact represents.

Excellent tables, lists, heading formats, paragraphs, formal writing, grammar/spelling, reference formatting and report structure. Very economical writing so the report is just under or exactly on the word count (no more), because (almost) no unnecessary word use. Does not use any scanned words. Excellent knowledge and original use of the ethical decision-making framework (including short, medium and long-term impact) to produce a highly expert analysis and argument. Original, excellent consideration and balance of viewpoints of and implications for the specified stakeholders. Comprehensive synthesising of credible, quality academic sources (way beyond minimum requirements) to make an original, convincing and very well informed argument. Very original, excellent counter-points to the opposing argument. Offers original insight into the complexity of the moral dilemma beyond just using academic sources.