Principle of judicial self-restraint

Reference no: EM13507717

Which of the following is NOT a 'principle of judicial self-restraint' ?

a. the Supreme Court is required to follow all of its past precedents no matter what

b. in order to sue, the plaintiff must have "standing," having suffered (or be about to suffer) some harm or injury

c. federal courts are not to render advisory opinions

d. courts will not hear cases that have become "moot" (i.e. the facts of the case or status of the parties have changed)

Reference no: EM13507717

Questions Cloud

Higher levels of wealth than the old-old and the oldest old : What is the primary reason that the young-old are more likely to be better educated and have higher levels of wealth than the old-old and the oldest old?

Experience of communicating in mixed-sex groups : Do the typical male-female patterns of conversation identified by Tannen correspond with your experience of communicating in mixed-sex groups?

Reduce misunderstandings and increase effectiveness : How can men and women adjust their conversational styles to reduce misunderstandings and increase effectiveness?

Concerning the state of fetal homicide law : Discuss the following questions concerning the state of fetal homicide law

Principle of judicial self-restraint : Which of the following is NOT a 'principle of judicial self-restraint' ?

Different segments of society disproportionately : Chronic diseases affect different segments of society disproportionately because of the lack of collective action people in the communities take toward reducing health disparities

Wealth is highly concentrated at the top : According to in-class lecture, wealth is highly concentrated at the top. That concentration is even greater for "income producing" wealth. The example used to evidence this fact was that the top 10% hold ____% of all corporate stock.

Interest groups : Interest groups...

Current political debates being waged to witness this idea : Politicians who argue for increasing taxes on the rich are often alleged to be promoting "class warfare." One needs to look no farther than the current political debates being waged to witness this idea. What does this allegation mean?

User Account

All Pages