Positive Conclusion of presentation Excellent, concise and compelling summary which motivates audience to action Very good , concise and compelling summary which motivates audience to action Effectively summarizes the presentation and provides a sense of closure. Provides an adequate summary with perfunctory sense of closure. Weak or no conclusion provided just drifts to an end. 1.5 TOTAL 30

Multimedia Support and Visual Aids: Excellent use of clear, compelling and appropriate materials to support presentation Very good use of clear, compelling and appropriate materials to support presentation Presentation includes a balanced use of appropriate multimedia that enhances the overall presentation (easy to read, attractive, informative, and error free). Presentation includes limited multi-media that enhance the overall presentation. Easy to read and informative, but not outstanding. Presentation includes little or no multimedia or uses it in distracting or ineffective manner (difficult to read, has errors &/or typos, etc.). 1.5

Ability to pre-empt audience concerns, Presentation Timing: Demonstrates superior command of topic and deals with questions sensitively but succinctly. Course uses the time effectively Demonstrates very good command of topic and deals with questions sensitively and reasonably succinctly. Course uses the time effectively Addresses all questions in a manner that demonstrates a good understanding of the topic(s) Course uses the time effectively Addresses most questions .But use of available time is rushed and sometimes disjointed Does not address basic questions about the topic or addresses them in a superficial manner. Ineffective use of time. 1.5

Clarity of Explanation of results Excellent clear presentation which clearly motivates the audience with clear, simple, easy instruction Very good clear presentation which clearly motivates the audience with clear, simple, easy instruction Good usually clear presentation which clearly motivates the audience with clear, simple, easy instruction Adequate clear presentation which sometimes motivates the audience with usually clear, instructions but could be simplified Inadequate presentation which does not the audience with unclear, overly complex, instructions 1.5

Understanding of and Engagement with Audience Excellent engagement with audience demonstrates superior understanding of all stakeholder concerns Very good engagement with audience demonstrates high level understanding of nearly all stakeholder concerns Good engagement with audience demonstrates good level understanding of most stakeholder concerns Adequate engagement with audience demonstrates some understanding of many of the major stakeholder concerns Inadequate engagement with audience demonstrates little or no understanding of any stakeholder concerns 3

Depth of Research & Background to trading conditions Excellent level of research and background using highly credible sources Very good level of research and background using highly credible sources Good level of research and background to topic using several good sources Adequate research but from only limited sources Little evidence of research or presentaion of adequate background to topic 6 Presentation of results in a clear, understandable way for ALL stakeholders Excellent, well reasoned and logical arguments to support presentation Very good , well reasoned and logical arguments to support presentation Good well reasoned arguments to support presentation Argument was basic and showed some flaws, tended to be incomplete to limited extent No logical argument presented to support major points of presentation 6

Criteria High Distinction 80% - 100% Distinction 70%- 79% Credit 60-69% Pass 50-59% Fail 0-49% Max. Mark Actual Mark Organization, Presentation flow Excellent organisation, clear, logical sequence with clear explanation and demonstration which leads audience to understanding Clear, logical sequence with clear explanation and demonstration which leads audience to understanding Presenter follows logical sequence and provides explanations and elaboration. Presenter follows logical sequence, but fails to elaborate. Presenter does not follow logical sequence (jumps around in presentation). 9