Last time your research plan gave me grade A, however the feedback from the professor was wesome, please try to work same as of last time. thank you so much! 29668690_1Feedback of Research Plan.docx Thanks a lot Experts mind !!!

Fail The nature of the research problem is not clear and must be largely assumed. TORs and rationale are absent or ill-defined. Relationship to an appropriate area of business / management is tenuous. Strategic importance of problem reads like a corporate brochure. Demonstrates little ability to conduct a major piece of self managed research. Methodology is ineffective for producing useful findings, or, approach taken does not take methodology into account. Scanty primary research data gathered, limited analysis, overall superficial attempt which would not be passed at undergrad level, let alone Master’s.

40-49% The student is able to define the research problem, although the terms of reference and rationale lack clarity. Some links are made to an appropriate academic area of business / management, even if contextualisation is limited. Strategic importance of dissertation is stated, but with little substantiation. Demonstrates a problem solving orientation in the design of methodology even if the execution of it is weak. Offers some critical reflection on research design and execution. The student must have collected both secondary and primary data and made some effort to abstract meaning from it. The dissertation begins with a focus and there are some linkages back to the original objectives. There is evidence of an intelligible argument, even if patchy and inconsistent. Some clear attempts are made to integrate theoretical ideas and the findings from secondary and primary research. Some of the conclusions and recommendations follow logically from the foregoing.

50-59% Research problem is stated, TORs and rationale are reasonably clear. Related to an appropriate academic area of business / management, and reasonable links are made to the wider overall context. Strategic importance of problem is explicit, although requiring some assumptions by the reader. Likely to show a range of strengths and weaknesses rather than an overall consistent approach e.g. good methodology, evaluation and critique of approach but sampling could be improved. Demonstrates reasonable ability to identify, gather, analyse and present authoritative and relevant data. Shows ability to learn from own mistakes. The dissertation is mainly focused with a reasonable line of argument, although the reader needs to make a few assumptions as it develops. Theory, secondary and primary evidence are reasonably well integrated, stronger in some areas than others. The conclusions and recommendations are related to the foregoing but the linkages between other chapters are less clear. TORs are largely met.

60-69% 50-59% Clear definition of research problem, TORs and rationale. Well related to an appropriate academic area of business / management in a wider context. Strategic importance of problem clearly presented. Research problem is stated, TORs and rationale are reasonably clear. Related to an appropriate academic area of business / management, and reasonable links are made to the wider overall context. Strategic importance of problem is explicit, although requiring some assumptions by the reader. Methodology is sound and student shows ability to identify limitations and critique own approach. Sampling is appropriate and complete enough for the purpose. Demonstrates good ability to identify, gather, analyse and present authoritative and relevant data. 60-69% The dissertation is clearly focused and there is a clearly discernible line of argument running through the work. Argument shows some originality and is convincing. Some of the linkages in the argument are more explicit than others. Theory, secondary and primary data show a high level of integration, mainly rigourous. Conclusions and recommendations are logically derived from and mainly supported by previous evidence.

Criteria 70% + Integration and Argument The dissertation is clearly focused and the line of argument consistently and explicitly reflects this focus. Argument displays much originality and is highly persuasive. Each chapter builds logically on the foregoing and drives the argument forward. Theory, secondary and primary data are carefully rigorously integrated. Conclusions and recommendations are logically derived from and fully supported by previous evidence. TORs are fully met. Written presentation Within word count +/-10%. Sources appropriately cited and referenced. Clearly written English, very well structured and presented.

Criteria 70% + Defining and contextualising the research problem Very clear definition of research problem, TORs and rationale. Thoroughly related to an appropriate academic area of business / management in a wider context. Strategic importance of problem very clearly presented. Design and execution of research methodology Methodology is well explained and entirely justifiable in relation to objectives, high level of reflection on and critique of own approach. Sampling is appropriate and very fit for the purpose. Demonstrates a high level of scholarship in identifying, gathering, analysing and presenting authoritative and relevant data.

6. You are reminded of the University’s regulations on cheating and plagiarism. In submitting your assignment you are acknowledging that you have read and understood these regulations. 7. Late submission within 10 working days of the deadline will result in the mark being capped at a maximum of 40%. Beyond this time the work will not be marked. (NB: only Mondays to Fridays are counted as working days). 8. You are reminded that it is your responsibility to keep an electronic copy of your assignment for future reference.

Base on My Dissertation Proposal and research plan, make a Primary Research of 5000 words.(By the way, my dissertation proposal and reseach plan were also writen by your experts 2. To submit electronically you must upload your work to the e-submission area within the respective organisation on blackboard. Click Submit> Browse (find the correct file to upload) Upload> Submit 3. Multiple drafts can be submitted up to the submission date and time. 4. Please remember you must leave at least 24 hours between submissions if you make changes to your work. Each submission will overwrite the previous one until the due date and time has passed. 5. You will receive a digital receipt as proof of submission. This will be sent to your Bucks e-mail address; please keep this for reference. To make sure you receive this it is best to have e mail forwarding to your personal e mail (go to http://bucks.ac.uk/forward to set this up – you need only do this once).