Reference no: EM133537367
Assignment: Case Study Analysis: Merck Case
Report Structure:
1. Problem Statement:
Clearly articulate the primary problem or challenge presented in the Merck case. Be concise and specific in identifying the core issue.
2. Group Goals:
Outline the objectives and goals your group aims to achieve through the analysis of the Merck case.
3. Alternatives:
Present a minimum of three distinct alternatives to address the identified problem. Ensure that these alternatives are well-reasoned and feasible within the context of the case.
4. Evaluation Criteria:
Define the criteria that your group will use to critically assess the three alternatives. The criteria should encompass key factors relevant to the case and decision-making process.
5. Evaluation of Alternatives:
Systematically evaluate each of the three alternatives against the established criteria. Provide a comprehensive analysis of the pros and cons associated with each alternative. Consider potential risks and benefits.
6. Selection of the Preferred Alternative:
Based on the thorough evaluation conducted, make a well-founded recommendation by choosing the best alternative among the three. Explain the rationale for your choice, highlighting why it stands out as the most suitable option.
Conclusion:
Summarize the key points of your case analysis and the chosen alternative. Emphasize the importance of the selected course of action in addressing the problem presented in the Merck case.
Appendix (if necessary):
Include any additional supporting materials, data, or references that are relevant to your analysis.