Solution-Prepare organisational leaderhip challenge report

Prepare organisational leaderhip challenge report

Reference no: EM132077267

Requirements:

Assessment 1 - Criticial Review Exercise

- Choose a published, academic journal article on a contemporary leadership issue from the list provided (7 pdf files of each article provided/attached with email);

Students are required to:

- Choose a published, academic journal article on a contemporary leadership issue from the list below (see p2 and Moodle for pdf files of each article).
- Write a critical (describe and analyse)review of the article (2000 words ± 10%).

Article Critique:
1. Introduction-Include the purpose of the research, type of research (e.g. exploratory, descriptive, causal), a brief overview of the article,and the significance of the study.

2. Body-Critically discuss the sections of the article. Specifically, focus on leadership theory/principles/models/research, and implications for leadership theory and for organisational practice.Sections of the article that could be critiqued include:

- Problem Area;Problem Statement.
- Variables;Conceptual/Theoretical model;Research Question(s)and/orResearch Hypotheses.
- Data CollectionMethods i.e. how were data collected e.g. interviews, questionnaire? Describe the sample size and sample selection methods. Identify the measures (if applicable) i.e. what instruments were used to gather data? Provide a brief description only.
- Data Analysis i.e. what data analysis techniques were used? Provide a brief description only.
- Discussion and Implications i.e. What were the research findings? What were the implications for leadership theory and/or leadership in organisational practice? Do you agree/disagree with the implications for leadership in organisational practice? Why/Why not?

3. Personal Learnings- Comment on your personal insights and learnings in relation to leadership theories/principles/models/research and organisational application stemming from this critique.

4. Conclusion-Write an overall conclusion to the critique.

References - Need to conform to the American Psychological Association (APA) requirements. Where applicable, author(s) name(s), journal title/book title, chapter title/article title, year of publication, volume number/issue number and the pagination must be present. Use of DOI is highly encouraged.

Appendices - include additional information as necessary and make sure it is referred to within the text.

Report Structure and Format:
- Include a title page that includes a title, unit name and number, student number.
- You do not need to include an abstract.
- Youdo need to include a Table of Contents that includes headings/subheadings and page numbers.
- The report should be formatted according to accepted academic requirements for formal written work i.e. text should be in Times New Roman, 12pt, double-spaced. All page margins need to be 2.54 cm.Include page numbers in the footer of the document.
- Use of headings and subheadings is highly encouraged to help structure your review.
- Include references e.g. if you reference theory in your report, include the reference within the text AND in the Reference list at the end of the document.If you quote an author, include the quote and reference within the text AND include the reference in the Reference list at the end of the document.

- Write a critical (describe and analyse) review of the article (2,000 words +/- 10%);

- Needs to adhere to Reference instructions provided (APA) requirements;

Journal Articles:

Blickle, G., Kane-Frieder, R. E., Oerder, K., Wihler, A., von Below, A., Schutte, N., Matanovic, A., Mudlagk, D., Kokudeva, T., & Ferris, G. (2013). Leader behaviors as mediators of the leader characteristics - follower satisfaction relationship. Group & Organization Management, 38, 601-629.

Graça, A. M., &Passos, A. M. (2015). Team leadership across contexts: A qualitativestudy.Leadership and Organization Development Journal,36(5), 489 - 511.

Joseph, E. E., & Winston, B. E. (2005). A correlation of servant leadership, leader trust, and organizational trust. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 26(1), 6-22.

Kirchner, M. J.(2018). Veteran as leader: The lived experience withU.S. Army leader development. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 29, 67-85.

Michel, J. W., Lyons, B. D., & Cho, J. (2010). Is the full-range model of leadership really a full-range model of effective leader behavior? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17, 1-15.

Sarros, J. C., & Santora, J. C. (2001b). Leaders & values: a cross-cultural study. Leadership & Organisational Development Journal, 22(5), 243-248.

Zigarmi, D., & Roberts, T. P.(2017). A test of three basic assumptions of Situational Leadership II Model and their implications for HRD practitioners. European Journal of Training and Development, 41(3). 241-260.

Assessment 2 - 'Organisational Leaderhip Challenge' Report'

‘Organisational Leadership Challenge'Report

Students are required to:
Write developed report of 3000 words ± 10% (not including title page, references, notes, figures, and tables) that includes:
- Identification of a currentissue/challenge/problem in your organisation related to leadership.
- Evidence of the impact the issue/challenge/problem is currently having on the organisation e.g., performance, teamwork, organisation culture, people etc.
- An evidence-based justification for topic selection.
- Use of leadership theories, principles, research, and models to:
o Analyse the factors/organisation environmental conditions/people contributing to the issue/challenge/problem.
o Diagnose the root cause of the issue/challenge/problem.
o Discuss how/why effective leadership is integral to resolving the issue/challenge/problem.
o Propose, contrast, and evaluate alternative leadership-based recommendations for resolving the issue/challenge/problem.
o Justifya recommend a leadership-based solution to solve the issue/challenge/problem.
o Outline and explain the benefits to the organisation that may stem from the implementation of the recommended solution.

Report structure should include:

Title page- include report title (descriptive of the topic), unit name and number, and student number.

Table of Contents - Include numbered sections and subsections of the report and associated page numbers.

1. Introduction - The text should begin on page 2. Sections could include: Background to the problem; Statement of the issue/challenge/problem; Justification for topic selection i.e., evidence relating to the impact the issue/challenge/problem is having on the organisation and anticipated benefits that may flow from issue/challenge/problem resolution. Outline the structure of your report.

2. Diagnosis -Using leadership theories, principles, research, and models, analyse factors/organisation environmental conditions/people contributing to the issue/challenge/problem. Diagnose the root cause of the issue/challenge/problem. Option: include a developed theoretical framework (i.e. conceptual model) that illustrates relations between variables central/contributing to the issue/challenge/problem.

3. Analysis of Solutions and Recommendation - Using leadership theories, principles, research, and models, discusshow/why effective leadership will contribute to resolving the issue/challenge/problem. Propose and evaluate alternative leadership-based recommendations for resolving the issue/challenge/problem.Justify your recommended solution with evidence. Identify anticipated benefits that will result from implementing recommended solution.

4. Personal Learnings - Discuss personal insights and learnings gained from this exercise.

5. Conclusion- Write an overall conclusion to the report.

References - Should conform to the American Psychological Association (APA) requirements. Where applicable, author(s) name(s), journal title/book title, chapter title/article title, year of publication, volume number/issue number and the pagination must be present. Use of DOI is highly encouraged.

Appendices - include additional information as necessary and make sure it is referred to within the text.

Report Structure and Format:
- Include a title page that includes a title, unit name and number, student number.
- You do not need to include an abstract.
- You do need to include a Table of Contents that includes headings/subheadings and page numbers.
- The report should be formatted according to accepted academic requirements for formal written work i.e. text should be in Times New Roman, 12pt, double-spaced. All page margins need to be 2.54 cm.Include page numbers in the footer of the document.
- Use of headings and subheadings is highly encouraged to help structure your review.
- Include references e.g. if you reference theory in your report, include the reference within the text AND in the Reference list at the end of the document; if you quote an author, include the quote and reference within the text AND include the reference in the Reference list.

- Write a developed report of 3,000 words +/- 10% (not including title page, references, notes, figures, and tables);

- Provide Title page, References according to APA, Notes, Figures and Tables which will be in addition to word limit;

Attachment:- Articles.rar

Verified Expert

There are two solutions for this assignment. The Assessment 1 requires the analysis of a literature in order to understnd the complexity of leadership & the different views of the authors with respect to the same. The first assessment is of 2000 words. The second assessment deals with developing a report on Organizational Leadership Challenge. The second assessment is of 3000 words. In total there is total 5000 words which has been done by using the Harvard referencing system.

Reference no: EM132077267

Questions Cloud

Risk management of the currency risk : What is the best strategy to use in the risk management of the currency risk?

Which of the tasks will inappropriate to use the job costing : If an individual performed the following four tasks, mortgage loan processing, textbook printing, residential building and Newsprint paper manufacturing.

Product costing in accounting : In the following for products which among them will be more appropriate to use job costing rather than using the product costing in accounting?

Probability of getting an even number from the die and tails : Please help determine probability of any outcome for example., the probability of getting an even number from the die and tails.

Prepare organisational leaderhip challenge report : Leadership - ZBUS8201 - University of New South Wales - Critically discuss the sections of the article. Specifically, focus on leadership theory

What trade name did you search : You are the manager for a company that wants to develop a new trade name for a new mobile application (mobile app). Come up with a new trade name.

Diminishing returns to labour and constant returns : You may assume diminishing returns to labour and constant returns to scale in production.

Relationship between inflation and economic growth : Economic studies have shown that countries that have high inflation rates have lower rates of economic growth than do countries with low inflation rates.

When there is a negative externality : When there is a negative externality, the marginal private cost of production ________ the marginal social cost of production.

Reviews

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:59:13 AM

Competent ability to express ideas inappropriately formal (impersonal),concise, and clear language. Competent ability to use accuratesentence structure, consistent andappropriate tense choice, and correctpunctuation.Structure was clear. Formatting was accurate. Competent ability to acknowledge source material with consistent and accurate referencing format. Very good ability to express ideas inappropriately formal (impersonal),concise, and clear language. Very good ability to use accuratesentence structure, consistent andappropriate tense choice, and correctpunctuation.Structure was very clear. Formatting was very accurate. Very good ability to acknowledge source material with consistent and accurate referencing format. Outstanding ability to express ideas inappropriately formal (impersonal),concise, and clear language.Outstanding ability to use accuratesentence structure, consistent andappropriate tense choice, and correctpunctuation.Superior structure evident. Formatting was faultless. Superior ability to acknowledge source material with consistent and accurate referencing format. 10-11 12 13-15

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:59:03 AM

Academic writing, document structure andformatting, referencing (15%) Inadequate ability to express ideas inappropriately formal (impersonal),concise, and clear language.Inadequate ability to use accuratesentence structure, consistent andappropriate tense choice, and correctpunctuation. Structurewas unclear.Formatting lacked attention to detail. Inadequate ability to acknowledge source material with consistent and accurate referencing format. Adequate ability to express ideas inappropriately formal (impersonal),concise, and clear language. Adequate ability to use accuratesentence structure, consistent andappropriate tense choice, and correctpunctuation. Structure was clear. Formatting was acceptable but included inaccuracies. Adequate ability to acknowledge source material with consistent and accurate referencing format. 0-7 8-9

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:58:46 AM

17-18 Personal learnings were relevant and clear. Competent ability to reflect on theimplications from the diagnosis, analysis, and recommendation to enhance learning of the subject.Conclusion wasrelevant and clear. 19-21 Personal learnings were relevant, clear, and in-depth. Very good ability to reflect on theimplications from the diagnosis, analysis, and recommendation to enhance learning of the subject.Conclusion wasvery relevant,clear, and insightful. 22-25 Personal learnings were relevant, clear, in-depth, and insightful. Outstanding ability to reflect on theimplications from the diagnosis, analysis, and recommendation to enhance learning of the subject.Conclusion wasvery relevant,clear, insightful, and innovative.

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:58:26 AM

Personal learnings,conclusion (20%) Personal learnings were not included and/or were irrelevant. Inadequate ability to reflect on theimplications from the diagnosis, analysis, and recommendation to enhance learning of the subject.Conclusion was missing or lacked clarity, cohesion and/or relevance. Personal learnings were relevant but lacked clarity.Adequate ability to reflect on theimplications from the diagnosis, analysis, and recommendation to enhance learning of the subject.Conclusion was relevant but lacked clarity.

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:58:14 AM

A competent understanding of leadershiptheory/principles/ models/researchrelating to the subject was demonstrated. Competent ability to propose, contrast, and evaluate competing alternative solutions was evident. Competent ability to propose and justify recommended solution and identify benefits that will emanate from it. Acomprehensive understanding of leadershiptheory/principles/ models/researchrelating to the subject was demonstrated. Very good ability to propose, contrast, and evaluate competing alternative solutions was evident. Very good ability to propose and justify recommended solution and identify benefits that will emanate from it. A superior understanding of leadershiptheory/principles/ models/researchrelating to the subject was demonstrated. An outstanding ability to propose, contrast, and evaluate competing alternative solutions was evident. Superior ability to propose and justify recommended solution and identify benefits that will emanate from it.

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:58:08 AM

Solutions,recommendation (25%) A poor understanding of leadership theory/principles/ models/research was demonstrated. Inadequate ability to propose, contrast, and evaluate competing alternative solutions was evident. Inadequate ability to propose and justify recommended solution and identify benefits that will emanate from it. An adequate understanding of leadership theory/principles/ models/researchrelating to the subject was demonstrated. Adequate ability to propose, contrast, and evaluate competing alternative solutions was evident. Adequate ability to propose and justify recommended solution and identify benefits that will emanate from it.

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:58:00 AM

Competent analysis of factors contributing to the issue.Competent ability to diagnose the root cause of the issue. Fair effort to develop a theoretical framework depicting relations between variables of interest and related to the issue. Comprehensiveanalysis of factors contributing to the issue. Very good ability to diagnose the root cause of the issue. Very good effort to develop a theoretical framework depicting relations between variables of interest and related to the issue. Outstanding analysis of factors contributing to the issue. Outstanding ability to diagnose the root cause of the issue. Superior effort to develop an innovative theoretical framework depicting relations between variables of interest and related to the issue.

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:57:54 AM

Diagnosis (25%) No, little or inadequate analysis of factorscontributing to the issue.Inadequate ability to diagnose the root cause of the issue. No or little effort to develop a theoretical framework depicting relations between variables of interest and related to the issue. Adequate analysis of factors contributing to the issue.Adequate ability to diagnose the root cause of the issue.Some effort to develop a theoretical framework depicting relations between variables of interest and related to the issue.

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:57:47 AM

Credit 65-74 Distinction 75-84 High Distinction 85 plus Introduction evident and clear. Background to the research problem and statement of the problem was clear and concise. Evidence was provided to justify issue selection. Report structure was clearly outlined. Introduction very evident and clear. Background to the research problem and statement of the problem was clear, concise, and supported with evidence. Clear evidence was provided to justify issue selection. Report structure was very clearly outlined. Introduction very evident, clear; and insightful.Background to the research problem and statement of the problem was clear, concise, and supported with evidence. Compelling evidence and insightwas provided to justify issue selection. Report structure was very clearly outlined and was innovative.

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:57:40 AM

Assessment 2: “Organisational Leadership Challenge”ReportMarking Rubric Assessment Criteria Fail less than 50 Pass 50-64 Introduction, identification and justification of issue (15%) Poor or no introduction. Little or no effort to provide concise background to and/or statement of the problem. Little or no evidence provided to justify issue selection. Report structure was not or poorly outlined. Introduction evident but lacked clarity.Background to the research problem and statement of the problem was adequate but lacked clarity and/or conciseness.Some evidence provided to justify issue selection. Report structure was outlined but lacked clarity and/or cohesion.

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:57:16 AM

Competent ability to express ideas inappropriately formal (impersonal),concise, and clear language. Competent ability to use accuratesentence structure, consistent andappropriate tense choice and correctpunctuation.Structure was clear. Formatting was mostly accurate. Competent ability to acknowledge source material with consistent and accurate referencing format. Very good ability to express ideas inappropriately formal (impersonal),concise, and clear language. Very good ability to use accuratesentence structure, consistent andappropriate tense choice and correctpunctuation.Structure was very clear. Formatting was very accurate. Very good ability to acknowledge source material with consistent and accurate referencing format. Outstanding ability to express ideas inappropriately formal (impersonal),concise, and clear language.Outstanding ability to use accuratesentence structure, consistent andappropriate tense choice and correctpunctuation.Superior structure evident. Formatting was faultless. Superior ability to acknowledge source material with consistent and accurate referencing format.

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:57:10 AM

Academic writing, document structure andformatting, referencing (15%) Inadequate ability to express ideas inappropriately formal (impersonal),concise, and clear language.Inadequate ability to use accuratesentence structure, consistent andappropriate tense choice and correctpunctuation. Structurewas unclear.Formatting lacked attention to detail. Inadequate ability to acknowledge source material with consistent and accurate referencing format. Adequate ability to express ideas inappropriately formal (impersonal),concise, and clear language. Adequate ability to use accuratesentence structure, consistent andappropriate tense choice and correctpunctuation. Structure was mostly clear. Formatting was acceptable but included inaccuracies. Adequate ability to acknowledge source material with consistent and accurate referencing format.

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:57:01 AM

Personal learnings, conclusion (20%) Personal learnings were not included. Inadequate ability to reflect on theimplications of the critique to enhance learning of the subject.Conclusion was missing or lacked clarity, relevance, and/or insightfulness. Personal learnings were relevant.Adequate ability to reflect on theimplications of the critique to enhance learning of the subject. Conclusion was relevant but lacked clarity and/or insightfulness. Personal learnings were relevantand thoughtful. Competent ability to reflect on theimplications of the critique to enhance learning of the subject.Conclusion wasrelevant, clear, and insightful. Personal learnings were relevant and in-depth. Very good ability to reflect on theimplications of the critique to enhance learning of the subject.Conclusion wasvery relevant, clear, and insightful. Personal learnings were relevant, in-depth, and insightful. Outstanding ability to reflect on theimplications of the critique to enhance learning of the subject.Conclusion wassuperior.

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:56:54 AM

Discussion, critical analysis, and evaluation of the article in relation to theory/principles/ models/researchrelating to the subject wasvery clear, in-depth, and insightful.Avery good understanding of theory/principles/ models/researchrelating to the subject was demonstrated. Discussion, critical analysis, and evaluation of the article in relation to theory/principles/ models/researchrelating to the subject was very clear, in-depth,insightful and included innovative ideas.An outstanding understanding of theory/principles/ models/researchrelating to the subject was demonstrated.

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:56:45 AM

Discussion, critical analysis, and evaluation of article (50%) Discussion, critical analysis, and evaluation of the article in relation to theory/principles/ models/researchrelating to the subject was unclear and/or inappropriate and/or elements were missing.An inadequate understanding of theory/principles/ models/researchrelating to the subject was demonstrated. Discussion, critical analysis, and evaluation of the article in relation to theory/principles/ models/researchrelating to the subject wasadequate but lacked clarity and/or depth or was incomplete.An adequate understanding of theory/principles/ models/researchrelating to the subject was demonstrated. Discussion, critical analysis, and evaluation of the article in relation to theory/principles/ models/researchrelating to the subject wasclear, in-depth,and complete.A good understanding of theory/principles/ models/researchrelating to the subject was demonstrated.

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:56:35 AM

Assessment 1: Critical Review Exercise Marking Rubric Student no.: Assessment Criteria Fail less than 50 Pass 50-64 Credit 65-74 Distinction 75-84 High Distinction 85 plus Introduction, research type and purpose,overview, and study significance (15%) Poor or no introduction. Little or no effort to clarify researchtype and purpose.Poor, confusing or nooverview of article. Study significance was not discussed or lacked clarity. Introduction evident but lacked clarity. Research type and purpose evident but lacked clarity.Article overview was provided but lacked clarity and/or cohesion.Discussion of study significance was adequate. Introduction evident and clear. Research type and purpose were clear.Article overview was clear and concise. Discussion of study significance was thoughtful.

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:54:18 AM

Assessment - 'Organisational Leaderhip Challenge' Report' (Instructions attached - Assessment 2 Requirements) - Write a developed report of 3,000 words +/- 10% (not including title page, references, notes, figures, and tables); - Provide Title page, References according to APA, Notes, Figures and Tables which will be in addition to word limit; - Report should STRICTLY ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED (Assessment 2 Requirements attached); - Review Assessment 2 Marking Guide attached with Tutor to ensure high level marks. Please review my instructions and attachments in detail and confirm that you clearly understand my requirements and provide me with a total competitve price as a return customer who has had many orders with you. Please again, ensure the Tutor is very experienced in writing post-graduate papers with very good english and grammar skills.

len2077267

8/6/2018 12:53:57 AM

I would like you to carefully understand and examine my requirements before you quickly get back to me. I need you to provide me with a quality Tutor who has good post-graduate writing skills in Management and Leadership with good grammar and spelling skills. The job requirements is as follows: Assessment 1 - Criticial Review Exercise (Instructions attached - Assessment 1 Requirements) - Choose a published, academic journal article on a contemporary leadership issue from the list provided (7 pdf files of each article provided/attached with email); - Write a critical (describe and analyse) review of the article (2,000 words +/- 10%); - Needs to adhere to Reference instructions provided (APA) requirements; - Review Assessment 1 Marking Guide attached with Tutor to ensure high level marks.

Write a Review

Required(*) Message

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

User Account

All Pages

Prepare organisational leaderhip challenge report

Reference no: EM132077267

Reference no: EM132077267

Questions Cloud

Reviews

len2077267

len2077267

len2077267

len2077267

len2077267

len2077267

len2077267

len2077267

len2077267

len2077267

len2077267

len2077267

len2077267

len2077267

len2077267

len2077267

len2077267

len2077267

Write a Review

Other Subject Questions & Answers

Assured A++ Grade

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT