Experts made an incredible showing with regards to on my venture. They were to a great degree proficient and fast with it. I would prescribe this site to anybody.

An extremely professional report. Sentences flow well. Ideas are clearly and logically expressed and developed. Tone and word choice adds to quality of the writing and enhances overall meaning. Writing is error free or nearly error free. Overall, most sentences clearly express appropriate ideas. Contains one or two insignificant errors that don’t interfere with comprehension or distract from the message. Generally adequate, but some problems with spelling/grammar/ English Expression/sentence structure that detract from the message A borderline effort. English expression, sentence structure, needs working on. Writing contains numerous and/or significant errors which interfere with comprehension and distract from the message and make the arguments difficult to follow - English expression/sentence structure and grammar is extremely poor throughout the entire report. You clearly need to address this issue.

The logical flow of ideas is excellent and length of each section appropriate. Descriptive subheadings provide a clear outline to the report. The logical flow of ideas is very good and length of each section appropriate. Descriptive subheadings generally provide a clear outline to the report. A reasonable flow of ideas and effective use of subheadings which provide an outline to the report. Flow of ideas needs improvement. Some subheadings Subheadings are missing, minimal or inappropriately labelled. And/or Document is too long. Word counts should be strictly adhered to. (business requirement was 1000 words Little or no effort has been made to present the report in a clear logical structure.

Recommendations are outlined in a professional style, are actionable, display clear logic and are wholly consistent with the content of the rest of the report. ·   Recommendations are clearly linked to the problem(s) and opportunity(ies). Recommendations are actionable, display clear logic and are consistent with the content of the rest of the report. ·   Recommendations are clearly linked to the problem(s) and opportunity(ies). The recommendations are adequate and in accord with a logic flowing from or based on the body of the paper. Recommendations are adequately linked to problem(s) or opportunity(ies) but the reader has to make some assumptions to link them. Some reasonable recommendationsbut at least one of the recommendations does not flow clearly and logically from the body of the paper. Recommendations have been included but are not linked to problem(s) or opportunity(ies). You need to rewrite this section. No attempt to include recommendations in the body of the report.

Extremely professional. Accurate and relevant conclusions have been drawn, and applied in an insightful way. Well written conclusions that are accurate and relevant Some conclusions that are accurate and relevant have been drawn from the analysis. An adequate attempt to draw conclusions from the analysis but revision is needed. Some attempt to draw conclusions from the data, analysis but they are generally inaccurate or irrelevant to the issue. No attempt to draw conclusions from the analysis.

Excellent use of supporting material/s. (including at least two extremely relevant charts) Appropriately labelled, positioned in text, referred to in text or as an appendix. Clearly adds to audience’s understanding. Effective use of supporting material/s. (including at least two charts) Appropriately labelled, referred to in text or as an appendix. Clearly adds to audience’s understanding. Effective use of supporting material/s (at least two charts) with only minor errors in set out, explanation or labelling. Adds to the audience’s understanding Supporting material is relevant (2 charts) with a reasonable connection to the content in the report, but not referred to appropriately within the text, or pooly displayed. Supporting material is present but is generally inappropriate or irrelevant

A thorough and professional discussion, comprehensively discussing all three variables, and other factors affecting these variables and additional factors which need to be considered before a final decision is made . Anomolies have been clearly identified. Congratulations. An extremely good discussion regarding the results of the analysis. (including all three variables and affects of distribution) Has discussed several factors /limitations affecting these results including additional factors which need to be considered before a final decision is made . a reasonable discussion about the meaning of the results, (including all three variables) and affects of distribution) including at least one factors affecting the results and at least one issue which needs to be considered before a final decision is made . Some discussion regarding results but either factors affecting the results or an issue which need to be considered before a decision can be made is missing. Minimal discussion regarding results or the analysis and/or factors influencing the results of the trial. no attempt to discuss the results of the analysisa and/or factors which may influence the results of the trial.

Complete and professional analysis (re flavours, regions and retailers) which clearly supports the report’s purpose. Clear evidence of additional calculations. Congratulations on a thorough, professional analysis. Good analysis (re juices, regions and retailers) Good use of %, proportions etc that ensure the data is described in the appropriate context. Adequate development/analysis of most content areas (re juices, regions and retailers) but missing some necessary content or analysis. Minimal analysis (re juices, regions and retailers) Analysis too descriptive, lacking in meaningful supporting evidence. Unacceptable analysis. Fails to address all three variables, (juices, regions, retailers). Lacks supporting evidence. No analysis performed to support the report’s purpose.

Introduction is excellent. An extremely professional effort. The introduction is concise, yet provides the reader with a clear framework for reading the rest of the report. The purpose of the report is present and clear, but the introduction includes unnecessary or irrelevant details. The purpose of the report needs to be much clearer. Choice of areas included in the introduction is irrelevant to the problem. Introduction has been attempted but is generally unclear or irrelevant. No purpose statement. No attempt to explain the purpose of writing the report

100% 80% 65% 50% 30% 0% Excellent demonstration. No formatting errors or omissions. Table of contents is automatically generated and looks professional. Instructions re content have been followed exactly. The reader (i.e., coworker, client, CEO) of this document would view it as extremely professional. Overall, a very good demonstration with only one or two minor formatting, content or convention problems. Table of contents automatically generated. Generally OK, but not a professional standard. Needs either several minor revisions or one major aspect (eg. Page numbering, paragraphing) needs revising. Several errors\and or formatting problems (eg: missing page numbers and/or missing headers/footers and/or poor paragraphing. (or table of contents not automatically generated) Not presented in an acceptable way. Instructions clearly not followed. The reader (i.e., coworker, client, CEO) of this document would view this formatting as unprofessional. (or no table or contents) totally unacceptable. Needs a complete rewrite

Report Submission The Business Report must be submitted, in MS Word format, no later than Sunday, 10, 11:59 pm, via the Turnitin link provided in the “Assignments” area on the ISYS2059 Business Computing 1 site on Canvas ? A Title Page – With an appropriate graphic, report title and student name & number. You should also provide the course name (Business Computing 1), course number (ISYS2059), your workshop time and your workshop tutors’ names. ? A Table of Contents (TOC)generated by MS ‘Word’. Word default settings for the table of contents should not be altered. ? A brief Introduction that outlines clearly the purpose of the report. ? A brief presentation of the analysis you have carried out and a discussion regarding the results of this analysis. ? Identification/discussion regardingother factors that may be affecting the results. ? A short concluding summary of the content of the report. ? Finally, at least two clear recommendations that Miriamcan adopt. These recommendations must be drawn from the analysis that you have carried out, and must have been discussed in the body of your report.

Report Content The analysis, findings and recommendations which you prepare for Miriam should be outlined in a professional business report. Report Format The report should be developed using the guidelines covered in the Online Business Communications Workshop . Ensure your report is concise: 1000 words. This word count includes title page and TOC. It does not include appendices. (Note: a 10% variance is acceptable.) . Present the report in a professional, business format with no spelling or grammatical errors. . Use appropriate headings and subheadings throughout the body of the report. . Align text using full justification. . Include a page header with a suitably formatted title (the header must not appear on the title page). . Include a footer with your name, id number and page number (the footer must not appear on the title page). . Include at least two appropriate charts - which you have created - either in the body of your report (appropriately labelled) or as an appendix at the end of the report. The material in the charts must be discussed as part of the paper.