Hi guys, Last night I received my "Task". A debt of gratitude is in order for that! Thank you for the work, Since I know how you measure pages I am all the more clear about expert's paper. That is not an issue. I appreciate the work your conversation has offered to me amid the past school year. I anticipate proceed with the relationship.

General Outstanding presentation, logically structured, using correct grammar and spelling, accurate referencing and bibliography correctly using the CU Harvard Style. Good presentation, completely structured, acceptable grammar and spelling, generally well referenced with correct use of the CU Harvard Style. Acceptable presentation and structure, acceptable grammar and spelling and acceptable referencing. Generally accurate use of CU Harvard Style. Adequate presentation and structure, grammar and spelling and adequate referencing. CU Harvard Style used but may contain some inaccuracies. Poor/weak presentation, grammar and spelling, little or no referencing, incorrect style, or very inaccurate use of CU Harvard style.

Question 3: a., b. & C. Calculation of BEP, desired profits and Margin of safety for both products. d. Discussion on which product is likely to earn higher profits Outstanding application of numeracy skills and excellent ability to apply the tools. Outstanding discussion on identifying the product which is going to earn higher profit during low and high demands based on the calculations. e. Role of CVP analysis in decision making Outstanding discussion and excellent understanding of the role of CVP analysis in decision making and evidence of rigorous literature review.

Question 2: a. Evaluation of projects using investment appraisal techniques. b. (i) Recommendatio n with appropriate justification. Outstanding application of numeracy skills. Outstanding recommendatio n which is extremely coherent with the evaluation and appropriately justified with evidence of rigorous literature review. (ii) Discussion on Outstanding non-financial discussion based factors on the non- financial factors given in the case study and excellent knowledge of relevant non- financial factors for the evaluation of given projects and evidence of rigorous literature review.

Question 1: a. Computation of vertical and horizontal statements and ability to apply the tool. (Detailed calculations for 3 years) b. (i) Literature Review Outstanding application of numeracy skills and excellent ability to apply the tools. Evidence of rigorous literature review and scholarly works. (ii) Analysis of Outstanding Liquidity and interpretation of Profitability critical factors in position of the the analysis and chosen company very meaningful using above conclusions calculations & drawn in relation literature to the company review. Ability of evaluation. to link the calculations and theory to draw valid discussion. c. Discussion on Outstanding techniques used discussion and for the analysis excellent knowledge of relevant theories and concepts related to the techniques used for the evaluation and evidence of rigorous literature review.

For a mark of >69% ? Show a thorough understanding of the purpose of the activity. ? Display knowledge of the major principles, theories, methodologies, and practices involved and an ability to apply them effectively. ? Provide evidence of wide reading, including academic journals. ? Demonstrate an ability to select critical points, evaluate them and communicate the conclusions effectively. ? Provide approaches that are creative, practicable, and supported. ? Provide a sound, supported critique of your own work. ? Provide sound and supported discussions of further research that may be needed.

Dear sir ,, I i wont to make for me this assignment and all information is in the PDF fill .... more over the title is (Financial University of Dofer Analysis)1. Work proposal should be submitted by week 5. The main task is identifying the company for doing the analysis and ensuring that the financial statements are available for three consecutive years. 2. The report should have table of contents and appendices if any. 3. Appropriate references using Harvard style of referencing and in-text citations are mandatory. 4. The report to follow font style Times New Roman, font size 12 and text color black. (Refer Student Manual) 6. Deadline for submissions is week 12. 7. A viva – voce may be conducted as per the discretion of the faculty and it carries no marks. 8. Marks awarded in the assessment is provisional till it is approved by the Exam Board