urv2136187
11/23/2018 12:45:03 AM
hi
this is the case study needed to complete this assignnment. This link has important guidelines and advice to do the assignment. It is provided by subject facilator. Thanks. I am very satisfied with the work I received. Thanks a lot. It is provided in the time and no further queries asked by the expert like other vendors. You are really professional to work with. Thanks once more.
|
len2136187
10/9/2018 9:42:40 PM
Format of answer consistent No efforts made to follow Meets most editing, spacing, Meets editing, spacing, fonts, Meets almost all editing, Meets all editing, spacing, fonts, /2
with question requirements and submission and editing, fonts, and other editing and other editing spacing, fonts, and other and other editing requirements.
KBS guidelines spacing, etc requirements. requirements. Some requirements. editing requirements.
requirements not met.
In-text referencing and Inappropriate referencing. Reasonably appropriate Good referencing, largely in- Very good referencing, 100% Excellent/appropriate /1
reference list follows Harvard Not in-line with requirements referencing, generally in-line line with requirements of in-line with requirements of referencing, 100% in-line with
style and consistent with KBS of Harvard style and with requirements of Harvard Harvard style and consistent Harvard style and consistent requirements of Harvard style
guidelines consistent with KBS style and consistent with KBS with KBS guidelines. with KBS guidelines. and consistent with KBS
guidelines. guidelines. guidelines.
|
len2136187
10/9/2018 9:42:34 PM
Correct academic writing style used, including correct spelling, grammar and punctuation Needs more sentence variety. Little or no thought given to diction. Tone or language is conversational. Contains much informal language. Uses “I” or “you.” Contains many examples of unclear or awkward phrasing. Needs more sentence variety. Attention needed with diction. Contains informal language or conversational tone, or uses “I” or “you.” Unclear or awkward sentence phrasing. Sentence variety is adequate. Tone is appropriate. Diction is clear, but could be more effective. Language is academic, and writing is clear and effective. Very little or no unclear or awkward phrasing. Sentence variety is effective and good. Tone is appropriate and consistent. Diction/ vocabulary is appropriate and effective.
Language is academic. Writing is clear, and concise. Sentence variety is effective and sophisticated. Tone is appropriate and consistent.
Diction/ vocabulary is sophisticated and effective. Language is academic. Writing is clear, concise, and strong. /2
|
len2136187
10/9/2018 9:42:27 PM
Appropriate theory and The critique does not have Reasonable critique which Good critique examines the A very good critique Fully considered all the relevant /2
research used to answer appropriate structure and lacks examines the relevant issues relevant issues and makes considered all the relevant issues and made significant
question posed direction. No significant and makes reasonable good observations from issues and made important observations made from
observations made from observations made from appropriate theory and observations made from appropriate theory and
appropriate theory and appropriate theory and research. Good writing and appropriate theory and research. Excellent writing and
research. Poor writing and research. Reasonable writing expression of arguments. research. Very good writing expression of arguments.
expression of arguments. and expression of arguments. and expression of arguments.
|
len2136187
10/9/2018 9:42:18 PM
Answer clearly and logically Serious lack of organization. Writing style could be more Paragraphs are generally well
presented Body paragraphs do not refer effective. Organization is hard organized. Better transitions
back to or relate to main to follow; there is little needed. The progression of
arguments. Writing is progression of ideas. Little or ideas could be more
formulaic, i.e. “in no transitions between thoughtful. Paragraphs relate
conclusion,” “another example is….” paragraphs. Need to more
effectively weave main arguments throughout and back to main arguments to prove argument.
relate body paragraphs.
|
len2136187
10/9/2018 9:42:08 PM
Sustainability Assessment Sustainability Assessment Demonstrated understanding Topic specific disclosures -
Social Sustainability Report demonstrates poor of case study organization attrition, discrimination, and
understanding of disclosure obligations based community engagement –
management approach on mostly accurately accurately identified from the
disclosure methodology. identified topic specific case study and appropriately
Failure to provide narrative disclosures - attrition, disclosed in Sustainability
explanation of topic discrimination, and Assessment Report with
specific disclosures. community engagement. reasonably clear narrative
Substandard effort to Narrative explanation using explanation using
make disclosures based management approach management approach
on case study information. disclosure methodology but disclosure methodology.
further work required to
improve clarity of disclosure.
|
len2136187
10/9/2018 9:41:55 PM
Methodology of the management approach to Effective adoption of management approach /10
disclosure used well to disclosure methodology to
prepare detailed narrative provide complete topic specific
explanations of topic specific disclosures – energy
disclosures - energy consumption, biodiversity,
consumption, biodiversity, environmental law breaches –
environmental law breaches. relevant to case study
Narrative explanations are organization. Articulate and
clear and incorporate vast highly detailed narrative
majority of relevant details explanations included in
from case study. Sustainability Assessment
Report.
|
len2136187
10/9/2018 9:41:43 PM
Sustainability Assessment
Environmental Sustainability Lack of understanding of disclosure requirements of Methodology of the management approach to Sustainability Assessment Report indicates general
case study organization. disclosure appropriately used awareness and solid
Insufficient narrative to prepare logical narrative understanding of purpose of
explanation or explanations of topic specific disclosure and required
commentary of topic disclosures - energy methodology. Relevant
specific disclosures - consumption, biodiversity, details from case study are
energy consumption, environmental law breaches. included within narrative
biodiversity, environmental Narrative explanations are explanation of topic specific
law breaches. reasonably clear but some disclosures - energy
Management approach important details from case consumption, biodiversity,
disclosure methodology study that should be included environmental law breaches.
not followed. have been overlooked.
|
len2136187
10/9/2018 9:41:19 PM
CR (Credit) 65%-74% D (Distinction) 75% - 84% HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% Mark
Assessment Content (Subject Specific) OUT OF 30 MARKS
Topic specific disclosures - Comprehensive Sustainability Assessment /10
climate change, corruption, understanding of case study Report demonstrates advanced
and anti-competitive organization disclosure level understanding of
behavior – accurately obligations based on management approach
identified from the case accurately identified topic disclosure methodology. Highly
study and appropriately specific disclosures - climate detailed narrative explanation
disclosed in Sustainability change, corruption, and anti- of topic specific disclosures –
Assessment Report with competitive behavior. climate change, corruption, and
reasonably clear narrative Clear narrative explanation anti-competitive behavior –
explanation using using management approach together with accurate and total
management approach disclosure methodology. disclosure based on case study
disclosure methodology. information.
|
len2136187
10/9/2018 9:41:12 PM
Criteria F (Fail) 0%-49% P (Pass)
50%-64%
Assessment Content (Subject Specific) OUT OF 30 MARKS
Sustainability Assessment Sustainability Assessment Demonstrated understanding
Economic Sustainability Report demonstrates poor of case study organization
understanding of disclosure obligations based
management approach on mostly accurately
disclosure methodology. identified topic specific
Failure to provide narrative disclosures - climate change,
explanation of topic specific corruption, and anti-
disclosures. Substandard competitive behavior.
effort to make disclosures Narrative explanation using
based on case study management approach
information. disclosure methodology but
further work required to
improve clarity of disclosure.
|